mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Roadmap of Designing Cognitive Metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

arXiv 2108.01737 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2021cs.HCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

More recently, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has shifted to focus on a more pragmatic or naturalistic account of understanding, that is, whether the stakeholders understand the explanation. This point is especially important for research on evaluation methods for XAI systems. Thus, another direction where XAI research can benefit significantly from cognitive science and psychology research is ways to measure understanding of users, responses and attitudes. These measures can be used to quantify explanation quality and as feedback to the XAI system to improve the explanations. The current report aims to propose suitable metrics for evaluating XAI systems from the perspective of the cognitive states and processes of stakeholders. We elaborate on 7 dimensions, i.e., goodness, satisfaction, user understanding, curiosity & engagement, trust & reliance, controllability & interactivity, and learning curve & productivity, together with the recommended subjective and objective psychological measures. We then provide more details about how we can use the recommended measures to evaluate a visual classification XAI system according to the recommended cognitive metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: