mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Contribution of XAI for the Safe Development and Certification of AI: An Expert-Based Analysis

arXiv 2408.02379 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing and certifying safe - or so-called trustworthy - AI has become an increasingly salient issue, especially in light of upcoming regulation such as the EU AI Act. In this context, the black-box nature of machine learning models limits the use of conventional avenues of approach towards certifying complex technical systems. As a potential solution, methods to give insights into this black-box - devised in the field of eXplainable AI (XAI) - could be used. In this study, the potential and shortcomings of such methods for the purpose of safe AI development and certification are discussed in 15 qualitative interviews with experts out of the areas of (X)AI and certification. We find that XAI methods can be a helpful asset for safe AI development, as they can show biases and failures of ML-models, but since certification relies on comprehensive and correct information about technical systems, their impact is expected to be limited.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

Builds on

18 of 48 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  4. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  7. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  8. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  9. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
  10. 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
  11. 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
  12. 2024Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Reviewcited by 52
6 more
  1. 2023Reveal to Revise: An Explainable AI Life Cycle for Iterative Bias Correction of Deep Modelscited by 17
  2. 2017A Berkeley View of Systems Challenges for AIcited by 15
  3. 2023Impact Of Explainable AI On Cognitive Load: Insights From An Empirical Studycited by 15
  4. 2024How should AI decisions be explained? Requirements for Explanations from the Perspective of European Lawcited by 10
  5. 2020Ensuring Dataset Quality for Machine Learning Certificationcited by 7
  6. 2023Model Reporting for Certifiable AI: A Proposal from Merging EU Regulation into AI Developmentcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.