mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Provable Robustness for Streaming Models with a Sliding Window

arXiv 2303.16308 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The literature on provable robustness in machine learning has primarily focused on static prediction problems, such as image classification, in which input samples are assumed to be independent and model performance is measured as an expectation over the input distribution. Robustness certificates are derived for individual input instances with the assumption that the model is evaluated on each instance separately. However, in many deep learning applications such as online content recommendation and stock market analysis, models use historical data to make predictions. Robustness certificates based on the assumption of independent input samples are not directly applicable in such scenarios. In this work, we focus on the provable robustness of machine learning models in the context of data streams, where inputs are presented as a sequence of potentially correlated items. We derive robustness certificates for models that use a fixed-size sliding window over the input stream. Our guarantees hold for the average model performance across the entire stream and are independent of stream size, making them suitable for large data streams. We perform experiments on speech detection and human activity recognition tasks and show that our certificates can produce meaningful performance guarantees against adversarial perturbations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2023.

Builds on

53 of 75 references.

References · 53

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  5. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  6. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  7. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  8. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 741
  9. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  10. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  11. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  12. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
38 more
  1. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  2. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  3. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  4. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  5. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
  6. 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
  7. 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
  8. 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
  9. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  10. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
  11. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 178
  12. 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
  13. 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 152
  14. 2016End-to-end Learning of Driving Models from Large-scale Video Datasetscited by 147
  15. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 133
  16. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 100
  17. 2017Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attackscited by 91
  18. 2020Deep Learning for Financial Applications : A Surveycited by 90
  19. 2019Achieving Verified Robustness to Symbol Substitutions via Interval Bound Propagationcited by 87
  20. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  21. 2016Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Raw Waveformscited by 68
  22. 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning using Adversarial Populationscited by 64
  23. 2020Curse of Dimensionality on Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Robustnesscited by 56
  24. 2017Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twinscited by 52
  25. 2018Training verified learners with learned verifierscited by 50
  26. 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin Dynamicscited by 45
  27. 2021CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional Smoothingcited by 41
  28. 2022Provable Reinforcement Learning with a Short-Term Memorycited by 40
  29. 2020Second-Order Provable Defenses against Adversarial Attackscited by 39
  30. 2021Improved, Deterministic Smoothing for L_1 Certified Robustnesscited by 39
  31. 2021Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  32. 2018Scene-Aware Audio for 360textdegree Videoscited by 25
  33. 2020A Framework for Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithmscited by 21
  34. 2019The Adversarial Robustness of Samplingcited by 18
  35. 2021Center Smoothing: Certified Robustness for Networks with Structured Outputscited by 18
  36. 2017Streaming Robust Submodular Maximization: A Partitioned Thresholding Approachcited by 13
  37. 2021Adversarial Robustness of Streaming Algorithms through Importance Samplingcited by 13
  38. 2020Online Automatic Speech Recognition with Listen, Attend and Spell Modelcited by 10

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.