mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistency

arXiv 2303.12419 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As one of the most fundamental techniques in multimodal learning, cross-modal matching aims to project various sensory modalities into a shared feature space. To achieve this, massive and correctly aligned data pairs are required for model training. However, unlike unimodal datasets, multimodal datasets are extremely harder to collect and annotate precisely. As an alternative, the co-occurred data pairs (e.g., image-text pairs) collected from the Internet have been widely exploited in the area. Unfortunately, the cheaply collected dataset unavoidably contains many mismatched data pairs, which have been proven to be harmful to the model's performance. To address this, we propose a general framework called BiCro (Bidirectional Cross-modal similarity consistency), which can be easily integrated into existing cross-modal matching models and improve their robustness against noisy data. Specifically, BiCro aims to estimate soft labels for noisy data pairs to reflect their true correspondence degree. The basic idea of BiCro is motivated by that -- taking image-text matching as an example -- similar images should have similar textual descriptions and vice versa. Then the consistency of these two similarities can be recast as the estimated soft labels to train the matching model. The experiments on three popular cross-modal matching datasets demonstrate that our method significantly improves the noise-robustness of various matching models, and surpass the state-of-the-art by a clear margin.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2023.

Builds on

36 of 58 references.

References · 36

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  4. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  5. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  8. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  9. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  11. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
  12. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
24 more
  1. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  2. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  3. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  4. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  5. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  6. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  7. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  8. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  9. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
  10. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  11. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  12. 2017Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Taskscited by 119
  13. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  14. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  15. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  16. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  17. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  18. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  19. 2019Adversarial Representation Learning for Text-to-Image Matchingcited by 65
  20. 2016Visual Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms, and Future Challengescited by 56
  21. 2016Deep Cross-Modal Hashingcited by 54
  22. 2021Estimating Instance-dependent Bayes-label Transition Matrix using a Deep Neural Networkcited by 30
  23. 2021Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Combating Confirmation Bias in Learning with Label Noisecited by 18
  24. 2022Reliable Label Correction is a Good Booster When Learning with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 7; 2025: 13; 2026: 3.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Multi-granularity Correspondence Learning from Long-term Noisy Videoscited by 34
  2. 2023Cross-modal Active Complementary Learning with Self-refining Correspondencecited by 22
  3. 2025Continual Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 19
  4. 2024Learning to Rematch Mismatched Pairs for Robust Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 11
  5. 2025IRGPT: Understanding Real-world Infrared Image with Bi-cross-modal Curriculum on Large-scale Benchmarkcited by 11
  6. 2024Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learningcited by 10
  7. 2023Negative Pre-aware for Noisy Cross-modal Matchingcited by 9
  8. 2023Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigationcited by 5
  9. 2026Fewer Steps, Better Performance: Efficient Cross-Modal Clip Trimming for Video Moment Retrieval Using Languagecited by 5
  10. 2024Disentangled Noisy Correspondence Learningcited by 4
  11. 2023CAPro: Webly Supervised Learning with Cross-Modality Aligned Prototypescited by 3
  12. 2025ReCon: Enhancing True Correspondence Discrimination through Relation Consistency for Robust Noisy Correspondence Learningcited by 3
15 more
  1. 2025Differential-informed Sample Selection Accelerates Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 3
  2. 2025Composed Multi-modal Retrieval: A Survey of Approaches and Applicationscited by 2
  3. 2025UtilGen: Utility-Centric Generative Data Augmentation with Dual-Level Task Adaptationcited by 2
  4. 2025TSVC:Tripartite Learning with Semantic Variation Consistency for Robust Image-Text Retrievalcited by 1
  5. 2025iEBAKER: Improved Remote Sensing Image-Text Retrieval Framework via Eliminate Before Align and Keyword Explicit Reasoningcited by 1
  6. 2025Multi-Modal Dataset Distillation in the Wildcited by 1
  7. 2025PCSR: Pseudo-label Consistency-Guided Sample Refinement for Noisy Correspondence Learningcited by 1
  8. 2026Variational Adapter for Cross-modal Similarity Representationcited by 1
  9. 2024REPAIR: Rank Correlation and Noisy Pair Half-replacing with Memory for Noisy Correspondencecited by 0
  10. 2024Debiased Orthogonal Boundary-Driven Efficient Noise Mitigationcited by 0
  11. 2024Robust Noisy Correspondence Learning via Self-Drop and Dual-Weightcited by 0
  12. 2025PAUL: Uncertainty-Guided Partition and Augmentation for Robust Cross-View Geo-Localization under Noisy Correspondencecited by 0
  13. 2025Testing chatbots on the creation of encoders for audio conditioned image generationcited by 0
  14. 2025PMPGuard: Catching Pseudo-Matched Pairs in Remote Sensing Image-Text Retrievalcited by 0
  15. 2026Intra-Modal Neighbors Never Lie: Rectifying Inter-Modal Noisy Correspondence via Graph-Based Intra-Modal Reasoningcited by 0