mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UtilGen: Utility-Centric Generative Data Augmentation with Dual-Level Task Adaptation

arXiv 2510.24262 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation using generative models has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing performance in computer vision tasks. However, most existing augmentation approaches primarily focus on optimizing intrinsic data attributes -- such as fidelity and diversity -- to generate visually high-quality synthetic data, while often neglecting task-specific requirements. Yet, it is essential for data generators to account for the needs of downstream tasks, as training data requirements can vary significantly across different tasks and network architectures. To address these limitations, we propose UtilGen, a novel utility-centric data augmentation framework that adaptively optimizes the data generation process to produce task-specific, high-utility training data via downstream task feedback. Specifically, we first introduce a weight allocation network to evaluate the task-specific utility of each synthetic sample. Guided by these evaluations, UtilGen iteratively refines the data generation process using a dual-level optimization strategy to maximize the synthetic data utility: (1) model-level optimization tailors the generative model to the downstream task, and (2) instance-level optimization adjusts generation policies -- such as prompt embeddings and initial noise -- at each generation round. Extensive experiments on eight benchmark datasets of varying complexity and granularity demonstrate that UtilGen consistently achieves superior performance, with an average accuracy improvement of 3.87% over previous SOTA. Further analysis of data influence and distribution reveals that UtilGen produces more impactful and task-relevant synthetic data, validating the effectiveness of the paradigm shift from visual characteristics-centric to task utility-centric data augmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.

Builds on

59 of 79 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  5. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  6. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  8. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  10. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  11. 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,231
  12. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
38 more
  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  2. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  3. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  4. 2021Variational Diffusion Modelscited by 1,145
  5. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  6. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 767
  7. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  8. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  9. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
  10. 2021Dataset Condensation with Distribution Matchingcited by 362
  11. 2022Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition?cited by 320
  12. 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 202
  13. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  14. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  15. 2021Free Lunch for Few-shot Learning: Distribution Calibrationcited by 165
  16. 2018Synthetic Data Augmentation using GAN for Improved Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 136
  17. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
  18. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
  19. 2023Diversify Your Vision Datasets with Automatic Diffusion-Based Augmentationcited by 100
  20. 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
  21. 2024Golden Noise for Diffusion Models: A Learning Frameworkcited by 91
  22. 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
  23. 2022Expanding Small-Scale Datasets with Guided Imaginationcited by 61
  24. 2022From Shapley Values to Generalized Additive Models and backcited by 59
  25. 2024A Noise is Worth Diffusion Guidancecited by 48
  26. 2022Harnessing Out-Of-Distribution Examples via Augmenting Content and Stylecited by 43
  27. 2024Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Modelscited by 39
  28. 2020Efficient computation and analysis of distributional Shapley valuescited by 38
  29. 2021HYDRA: Hypergradient Data Relevance Analysis for Interpreting Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  30. 2024Zigzag Diffusion Sampling: Diffusion Models Can Self-Improve via Self-Reflectioncited by 38
  31. 2023Data Valuation Without Training of a Modelcited by 35
  32. 2023Real-Fake: Effective Training Data Synthesis Through Distribution Matchingcited by 35
  33. 2024DEEM: Diffusion Models Serve as the Eyes of Large Language Models for Image Perceptioncited by 32
  34. 2021Estimating Instance-dependent Bayes-label Transition Matrix using a Deep Neural Networkcited by 30
  35. 2024DataDream: Few-shot Guided Dataset Generationcited by 28
  36. 2023BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistencycited by 27
  37. 2015Do We Need More Training Data?cited by 26
  38. 2021Rethinking Influence Functions of Neural Networks in the Over-parameterized Regimecited by 26

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.