mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Noisy Correspondence Learning via Self-Drop and Dual-Weight

arXiv 2412.06172 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many researchers collect data from the internet through crowd-sourcing or web crawling to alleviate the data-hungry challenge associated with cross-modal matching. Although such practice does not require expensive annotations, it inevitably introduces mismatched pairs and results in a noisy correspondence problem. Current approaches leverage the memorization effect of deep neural networks to distinguish noise and perform re-weighting. However, briefly lowering the weight of noisy pairs cannot eliminate the negative impact of noisy correspondence in the training process. In this paper, we propose a novel self-drop and dual-weight approach, which achieves elaborate data processing by qua-partitioning the data. Specifically, our approach partitions all data into four types: clean and significant, clean yet insignificant, vague, and noisy. We analyze the effect of noisy and clean data pairs and find that for vision-language pre-training models, a small number of clean samples is more valuable than a majority of noisy ones. Based on this observation, we employ self-drop to discard noisy samples to effectively mitigate the impact of noise. In addition, we adopt a dual-weight strategy to ensure that the model focuses more on significant samples while appropriately leveraging vague samples. Compared to the prior works, our approach is more robust and demonstrates relatively more stable performance on noisy datasets, especially under a high noise ratio. Extensive experiments on three widely used datasets, including Flickr30K, MS-COCO, and Conceptual Captions, validate the effectiveness of our approach.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.

Builds on

39 of 70 references.

References · 39

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  7. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  9. 2021RegionCLIP: Region-based Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 612
  10. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  11. 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 560
  12. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
27 more
  1. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 414
  2. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  3. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  4. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  5. 2019Visual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matchingcited by 185
  6. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 150
  7. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  8. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 136
  9. 2015A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labelscited by 126
  10. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  11. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  12. 2020Graph Structured Network for Image-Text Matchingcited by 93
  13. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  14. 2021On the Impact of Spurious Correlation for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 68
  15. 2024Negative Label Guided OOD Detection with Pretrained Vision-Language Modelscited by 66
  16. 2023Noisy-Correspondence Learning for Text-to-Image Person Re-identificationcited by 55
  17. 2023Improved Probabilistic Image-Text Representationscited by 40
  18. 2022Graph Matching with Bi-level Noisy Correspondencecited by 30
  19. 2023BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistencycited by 27
  20. 2023Noisy Correspondence Learning with Meta Similarity Correctioncited by 26
  21. 2023Decoupled Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Order Random Walkscited by 23
  22. 2022Noise-aware Learning from Web-crawled Image-Text Data for Image Captioningcited by 22
  23. 2023Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 22
  24. 2023Cross-modal Active Complementary Learning with Self-refining Correspondencecited by 22
  25. 2024Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learningcited by 10
  26. 2023Negative Pre-aware for Noisy Cross-modal Matchingcited by 9
  27. 2023Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Unlearning the Noisy Correspondence Makes CLIP More Robust
  2. 2025Towards Robust Semantic Correspondence: A Benchmark and Insights
  3. 2025Noise Matters: Optimizing Matching Noise for Diffusion Classifiers
  4. 2022Perception Prioritized Training of Diffusion Models
  5. 2025Early Estimation of Language to Latent Alignment in Diffusion Models
  6. 2026Training Flow Matching: The Role of Weighting and Parameterization
  7. 2026Your CLIP has 164 dimensions of noise: Exploring the embeddings covariance eigenspectrum of contrastively pretrained vision-language transformers
  8. 2023Diffusion Model for Dense Matching