Reliable Label Correction is a Good Booster When Learning with Extremely Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with noisy labels has aroused much research interest since data annotations, especially for large-scale datasets, may be inevitably imperfect. Recent approaches resort to a semi-supervised learning problem by dividing training samples into clean and noisy sets. This paradigm, however, is prone to significant degeneration under heavy label noise, as the number of clean samples is too small for conventional methods to behave well. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework, termed as LC-Booster, to explicitly tackle learning under extreme noise. The core idea of LC-Booster is to incorporate label correction into the sample selection, so that more purified samples, through the reliable label correction, can be utilized for training, thereby alleviating the confirmation bias. Experiments show that LC-Booster advances state-of-the-art results on several noisy-label benchmarks, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Clothing1M and WebVision. Remarkably, under the extreme 90% noise ratio, LC-Booster achieves 92.9% and 48.4% accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, surpassing state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2022.
Builds on
35 of 43 references.
References · 35
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
23 more
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 544
- 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2020Suppressing Uncertainties for Large-Scale Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 157
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
- 2020Suppressing Mislabeled Data via Grouping and Self-Attentioncited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
- 2023BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistencycited by 27
- 2022Divide to Adapt: Mitigating Confirmation Bias for Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Predictorscited by 19
- 2024Learning from Different Samples: A Source-free Framework for Semi-supervised Domain Adaptationcited by 2
- 2024Learning from Different Samples: A Source-free Framework for Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation11 Nov 2024
- 2023BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistency22 Mar 2023
- 2022Divide to Adapt: Mitigating Confirmation Bias for Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Predictors28 May 2022
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influence19 May 2022