mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic fairness-aware recommendation through multi-agent social choice

arXiv 2303.00968 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2023cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algorithmic fairness in the context of personalized recommendation presents significantly different challenges to those commonly encountered in classification tasks. Researchers studying classification have generally considered fairness to be a matter of achieving equality of outcomes between a protected and unprotected group, and built algorithmic interventions on this basis. We argue that fairness in real-world application settings in general, and especially in the context of personalized recommendation, is much more complex and multi-faceted, requiring a more general approach. We propose a model to formalize multistakeholder fairness in recommender systems as a two stage social choice problem. In particular, we express recommendation fairness as a novel combination of an allocation and an aggregation problem, which integrate both fairness concerns and personalized recommendation provisions, and derive new recommendation techniques based on this formulation. Simulations demonstrate the ability of the framework to integrate multiple fairness concerns in a dynamic way.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.

Builds on

23 of 84 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  2. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
  3. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  4. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 77
  5. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  6. 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 69
  7. 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 67
  8. 2016Display Advertising with Real-Time Bidding (RTB) and Behavioural Targetingcited by 42
  9. 2013Real-time Bidding for Online Advertising: Measurement and Analysiscited by 32
  10. 2022Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directionscited by 30
  11. 2021Fairness in Information Access Systemscited by 27
  12. 2021Multi-FR: A Multi-objective Optimization Framework for Multi-stakeholder Fairness-aware Recommendationcited by 25
11 more
  1. 2019This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary Confusion Realizing a Value in Technologycited by 24
  2. 2022Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directionscited by 21
  3. 2015Online Fair Division: analysing a Food Bank problemcited by 20
  4. 2017Allocation Problems in Ride-Sharing Platforms: Online Matching with Offline Reusable Resourcescited by 13
  5. 2020Opportunistic Multi-aspect Fairness through Personalized Re-rankingcited by 11
  6. 2021Recommendation Fairness: From Static to Dynamiccited by 10
  7. 2022Long-term Dynamics of Fairness Intervention in Connection Recommender Systemscited by 10
  8. 2018Personalizing Fairness-aware Re-rankingcited by 9
  9. 2022FairSR: Fairness-aware Sequential Recommendation through Multi-Task Learning with Preference Graph Embeddingscited by 9
  10. 2020"And the Winner Is...": Dynamic Lotteries for Multi-group Fairness-Aware Recommendationcited by 5
  11. 2022Who Pays? Personalization, Bossiness and the Cost of Fairnesscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

9 papers.