Opportunistic Multi-aspect Fairness through Personalized Re-ranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As recommender systems have become more widespread and moved into areas with greater social impact, such as employment and housing, researchers have begun to seek ways to ensure fairness in the results that such systems produce. This work has primarily focused on developing recommendation approaches in which fairness metrics are jointly optimized along with recommendation accuracy. However, the previous work had largely ignored how individual preferences may limit the ability of an algorithm to produce fair recommendations. Furthermore, with few exceptions, researchers have only considered scenarios in which fairness is measured relative to a single sensitive feature or attribute (such as race or gender). In this paper, we present a re-ranking approach to fairness-aware recommendation that learns individual preferences across multiple fairness dimensions and uses them to enhance provider fairness in recommendation results. Specifically, we show that our opportunistic and metric-agnostic approach achieves a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness than prior re-ranking approaches and does so across multiple fairness dimensions.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
- 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
- 2021Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspectivecited by 10
- 2023Dynamic fairness-aware recommendation through multi-agent social choicecited by 9
- 2025FairEval: Evaluating Fairness in LLM-Based Recommendations with Personality Awarenesscited by 8
- 2024FairSTG: Countering performance heterogeneity via collaborative sample-level optimizationcited by 3
- 2022Who Pays? Personalization, Bossiness and the Cost of Fairnesscited by 2
- 2023Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utilitycited by 2
- 2023Exploring Social Choice Mechanisms for Recommendation Fairness in SCRUFcited by 0
- 2024Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026LLM-Assisted Reranking to Operationalize Nuanced Objectives in Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2026LLM-Assisted Reranking to Operationalize Nuanced Objectives in Recommender Systems1 Jun 2026
- 2025FairEval: Evaluating Fairness in LLM-Based Recommendations with Personality Awareness10 Apr 2025
- 2024Social Choice for Heterogeneous Fairness in Recommendation6 Oct 2024
- 2024FairSTG: Countering performance heterogeneity via collaborative sample-level optimization19 Mar 2024
- 2023Exploring Social Choice Mechanisms for Recommendation Fairness in SCRUF10 Sep 2023
- 2023Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utility5 Sep 2023
- 2023Dynamic fairness-aware recommendation through multi-agent social choice2 Mar 2023
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems21 Sep 2022
- 2022Who Pays? Personalization, Bossiness and the Cost of Fairness8 Sep 2022
- 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providers19 Apr 2021
- 2021Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspective16 Mar 2021