mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Value-Preserving Architectures for Agentic AI Systems

arXiv 2609.03920 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of agentic AI and LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) presents unprecedented opportunities for automating complex tasks, while simultaneously raising critical concerns about the preservation of fundamental human-centered values, such as privacy, fairness, and safety. Although software engineering has traditionally focused on functional correctness, the adoption of LLMs and AI agents into complex socio-technical systems has intensified the need for responsible software engineering and robust value alignment. In MAS, architectural design decisions, such as coordination mechanisms, communication protocols, and system topologies, play a central role in shaping system behavior and the outcomes they produce. This paper argues that architectural choices influence not only the functionality and performance of MAS but can also promote value-oriented system behavior. Therefore, we investigate how different architectural designs support different human-centered values, discussing the following value-preserving architectural patterns: (i) a privacy-aware architecture with a federated topology, (ii) a distributed architecture to promote pluralism and diversity, and (iii) a guard-agent architecture to detect and mitigate unfairness. Finally, we introduce representative use cases to illustrate the proposed architectures in real-world scenarios. By linking architectural design with human-centered values, this work lays the foundation for a unified set of architectural patterns and guidelines towards the design of trustworthy MAS.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Agent Design Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Architectural Patterns for Foundation Model based Agents16 May
  2. 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems20 Feb

Other references · 13

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 113
  5. 2024Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactionscited by 51
  6. 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 28
  7. 2024Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs Via Simulated Social Ensemblescited by 17
  8. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoningcited by 17
  9. 2026The Orchestration of Multi-Agent Systems: Architectures, Protocols, and Enterprise Adoptioncited by 15
  10. 2024Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agentscited by 14
  11. 2022Towards a Roadmap on Software Engineering for Responsible AIcited by 9
  12. 2023Dynamic fairness-aware recommendation through multi-agent social choicecited by 9
1 more
  1. 2021Operationalizing Human Values in Software Engineering: A Surveycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
  2. 2026Architecting Agentic Communities using Design Patterns
  3. 2025Stop Reducing Responsibility in LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Systems to Local Alignment
  4. 2026Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: An SDLC-Oriented Rapid Review
  5. 2025Distinguishing Autonomous AI Agents from Collaborative Agentic Systems: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Modern Intelligent Architectures
  6. 2025TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
  8. 2026Agentic Software: How AI Agents Are Restructuring the Software Paradigm