FederatedTrust: A Solution for Trustworthy Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge Computing has presented challenges for centralized Machine and Deep Learning (ML/DL) methods due to the presence of distributed data silos that hold sensitive information. To address concerns regarding data privacy, collaborative and privacy-preserving ML/DL techniques like Federated Learning (FL) have emerged. However, ensuring data privacy and performance alone is insufficient since there is a growing need to establish trust in model predictions. Existing literature has proposed various approaches on trustworthy ML/DL (excluding data privacy), identifying robustness, fairness, explainability, and accountability as important pillars. Nevertheless, further research is required to identify trustworthiness pillars and evaluation metrics specifically relevant to FL models, as well as to develop solutions that can compute the trustworthiness level of FL models. This work examines the existing requirements for evaluating trustworthiness in FL and introduces a comprehensive taxonomy consisting of six pillars (privacy, robustness, fairness, explainability, accountability, and federation), along with over 30 metrics for computing the trustworthiness of FL models. Subsequently, an algorithm named FederatedTrust is designed based on the pillars and metrics identified in the taxonomy to compute the trustworthiness score of FL models. A prototype of FederatedTrust is implemented and integrated into the learning process of FederatedScope, a well-established FL framework. Finally, five experiments are conducted using different configurations of FederatedScope to demonstrate the utility of FederatedTrust in computing the trustworthiness of FL models. Three experiments employ the FEMNIST dataset, and two utilize the N-BaIoT dataset considering a real-world IoT security use case.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.
Builds on
47 of 93 references.
References · 47
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
- 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 533
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
35 more
- 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 371
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
- 2017TernGrad: Ternary Gradients to Reduce Communication in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 253
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
- 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 174
- 2020Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defensescited by 163
- 2022Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challengescited by 137
- 2020Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiatedcited by 127
- 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
- 2019Reliable Federated Learning for Mobile Networkscited by 92
- 2020Local and Central Differential Privacy for Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learningcited by 72
- 2019Byzantine-Robust Federated Machine Learning through Adaptive Model Averagingcited by 70
- 2018N-BaIoT: Network-based Detection of IoT Botnet Attacks Using Deep Autoencoderscited by 67
- 2020An Efficiency-boosting Client Selection Scheme for Federated Learning with Fairness Guaranteecited by 61
- 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
- 2022FederatedScope: A Flexible Federated Learning Platform for Heterogeneitycited by 53
- 2020Federated learning with class imbalance reductioncited by 52
- 2019Differential Privacy-enabled Federated Learning for Sensitive Health Datacited by 44
- 2020Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2019Interpret Federated Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 33
- 2021Improving Fairness for Data Valuation in Horizontal Federated Learningcited by 22
- 2020BlockFLA: Accountable Federated Learning via Hybrid Blockchain Architecturecited by 20
- 2021Architectural Patterns for the Design of Federated Learning Systemscited by 17
- 2019Towards Quantification of Explainability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methodscited by 15
- 2020Quality Inference in Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 15
- 2020A Systematic Literature Review on Federated Machine Learning: From A Software Engineering Perspectivecited by 14
- 2020BlockFLow: An Accountable and Privacy-Preserving Solution for Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2021A Quantitative Metric for Privacy Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2015Technical Privacy Metrics: a Systematic Surveycited by 11
- 2022Towards an Accountable and Reproducible Federated Learning: A FactSheets Approachcited by 3
- 2022Federated Learning Cost Disparity for IoT Devicescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Sentinel: An Aggregation Function to Secure Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2024Enabling Trustworthy Federated Learning in Industrial IoT: Bridging the Gap Between Interpretability and Robustnesscited by 3
- 2024Federated Learning and AI Regulation in the European Union: Who is Responsible? -- An Interdisciplinary Analysiscited by 1
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Surveycited by 0
- 2026Trust-Based Incentive Mechanisms in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning Systemscited by 0
- 2026Trust-Based Incentive Mechanisms in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning Systems9 Feb 2026
- 2024Enabling Trustworthy Federated Learning in Industrial IoT: Bridging the Gap Between Interpretability and Robustness1 Sep 2024
- 2024Federated Learning and AI Regulation in the European Union: Who is Responsible? -- An Interdisciplinary Analysis11 Jul 2024
- 2024Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Survey1 Jun 2024
- 2023Sentinel: An Aggregation Function to Secure Decentralized Federated Learning12 Oct 2023