mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2506.02453 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) aims to online adapt a pre-trained model to changing environments during inference. Most existing methods focus on exploiting target data, while overlooking another crucial source of information, the pre-trained weights, which encode underutilized domain-invariant priors. This paper takes the geometric attributes of pre-trained weights as a starting point, systematically analyzing three key components: magnitude, absolute angle, and pairwise angular structure. We find that the pairwise angular structure remains stable across diverse corrupted domains and encodes domain-invariant semantic information, suggesting it should be preserved during adaptation. Based on this insight, we propose PAID (Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition), a prior-driven CTTA method that decomposes weight into magnitude and direction, and introduces a learnable orthogonal matrix via Householder reflections to globally rotate direction while preserving the pairwise angular structure. During adaptation, only the magnitudes and the orthogonal matrices are updated. PAID achieves consistent improvements over recent SOTA methods on four widely used CTTA benchmarks, demonstrating that preserving pairwise angular structure offers a simple yet effective principle for CTTA.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

64 of 83 references.

References · 64

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  3. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  4. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  8. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 758
  9. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  10. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  11. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  12. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
38 more
  1. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
  2. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
  3. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  4. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
  5. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 382
  6. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  7. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  8. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  9. 2023AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 357
  10. 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 290
  11. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  12. 2023Controlling Text-to-Image Diffusion by Orthogonal Finetuningcited by 208
  13. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
  14. 2018Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 183
  15. 2021FSDR: Frequency Space Domain Randomization for Domain Generalizationcited by 164
  16. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 151
  17. 2020Harmonizing Transferability and Discriminability for Adapting Object Detectorscited by 126
  18. 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
  19. 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
  20. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  21. 2018Learning towards Minimum Hyperspherical Energycited by 75
  22. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  23. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  24. 2021Amplitude-Phase Recombination: Rethinking Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Frequency Domaincited by 71
  25. 2023Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correctioncited by 65
  26. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  27. 2023SoTTA: Robust Test-Time Adaptation on Noisy Data Streamscited by 63
  28. 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 59
  29. 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 58
  30. 2017Deep Hyperspherical Learningcited by 55
  31. 2018Decoupled Networkscited by 45
  32. 2020Orthogonal Over-Parameterized Trainingcited by 44
  33. 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 44
  34. 2022Deep Frequency Filtering for Domain Generalizationcited by 43
  35. 2023Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptationcited by 42
  36. 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 41
  37. 2021Feature Stylization and Domain-aware Contrastive Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 40
  38. 2023Efficient Adaptation of Large Vision Transformer via Adapter Re-Composingcited by 35

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.