MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LiDAR-based 3D object detection is crucial for various applications but often experiences performance degradation in real-world deployments due to domain shifts. While most studies focus on cross-dataset shifts, such as changes in environments and object geometries, practical corruptions from sensor variations and weather conditions remain underexplored. In this work, we propose a novel online test-time adaptation framework for 3D detectors that effectively tackles these shifts, including a challenging cross-corruption scenario where cross-dataset shifts and corruptions co-occur. By leveraging long-term knowledge from previous test batches, our approach mitigates catastrophic forgetting and adapts effectively to diverse shifts. Specifically, we propose a Model Synergy (MOS) strategy that dynamically selects historical checkpoints with diverse knowledge and assembles them to best accommodate the current test batch. This assembly is directed by our proposed Synergy Weights (SW), which perform a weighted averaging of the selected checkpoints, minimizing redundancy in the composite model. The SWs are computed by evaluating the similarity of predicted bounding boxes on the test data and the independence of features between checkpoint pairs in the model bank. To maintain an efficient and informative model bank, we discard checkpoints with the lowest average SW scores, replacing them with newly updated models. Our method was rigorously tested against existing test-time adaptation strategies across three datasets and eight types of corruptions, demonstrating superior adaptability to dynamic scenes and conditions. Notably, it achieved a 67.3% improvement in a challenging cross-corruption scenario, offering a more comprehensive benchmark for adaptation. Source code: https://github.com/zhuoxiao-chen/MOS.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 76 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.
Builds on
76 of 99 references.
References · 76
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
38 more
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
- 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 359
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2019REMIND Your Neural Network to Prevent Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 197
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
- 2021ST3D: Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 158
- 2020Train in Germany, Test in The USA: Making 3D Object Detectors Generalizecited by 150
- 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
- 2015End-to-end people detection in crowded scenescited by 140
- 2019LaserNet: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Object Detector for Autonomous Drivingcited by 133
- 20223D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 132
- 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
- 2023Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptionscited by 128
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2023DSVT: Dynamic Sparse Voxel Transformer with Rotated Setscited by 122
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112
- 2019GS3D: An Efficient 3D Object Detection Framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 106
- 20213D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 106
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2021SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generationcited by 93
- 2022LiDAR Snowfall Simulation for Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 72
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Detection with Multi-Level Consistencycited by 63
- 2023SoTTA: Robust Test-Time Adaptation on Noisy Data Streamscited by 63
- 2021ST3D++: Denoised Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 57
- 2022LiDAR Distillation: Bridging the Beam-Induced Domain Gap for 3D Object Detectioncited by 54
- 2022Stop Wasting My Time! Saving Days of ImageNet and BERT Training with Latest Weight Averagingcited by 54
- 20213D-VField: Adversarial Augmentation of Point Clouds for Domain Generalization in 3D Object Detectioncited by 43
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
- 2023Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptationcited by 42
- 2022Towards Online Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 36
- 2019Domain Adaptation for Vehicle Detection from Bird's Eye View LiDAR Point Cloud Datacited by 35
- 2020InfoFocus: 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving with Dynamic Information Modelingcited by 35
- 2021PIT: Position-Invariant Transform for Cross-FoV Domain Adaptationcited by 30
50 most cited of 76 All 76 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025MergeVLA: Cross-Skill Model Merging Toward a Generalist Vision-Language-Action Agentcited by 15
- 2024Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptationcited by 5
- 2025APCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 2
- 2025CodeMerge: Codebook-Guided Model Merging for Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2025OraPO: Oracle-educated Reinforcement Learning for Data-efficient and Factual Radiology Report Generationcited by 1
- 2024Test-time Correction: An Online 3D Detection System via Visual Promptingcited by 0
- 2025MergeVLA: Cross-Skill Model Merging Toward a Generalist Vision-Language-Action Agent24 Nov 2025
- 2025OraPO: Oracle-educated Reinforcement Learning for Data-efficient and Factual Radiology Report Generation23 Sep 2025
- 2025CodeMerge: Codebook-Guided Model Merging for Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Autonomous Driving22 May 2025
- 2025APCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds15 May 2025
- 2024Test-time Correction: An Online 3D Detection System via Visual Prompting10 Dec 2024
- 2024Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptation16 Oct 2024