mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Robustness at Test-Time from a Non-Robust Teacher

arXiv 2604.11590 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, pretrained models are increasingly used as general-purpose backbones and adapted at test-time to downstream environments where target data are scarce and unlabeled. While this paradigm has proven effective for improving clean accuracy on the target domain, adversarial robustness has received far less attention, especially when the original pretrained model is not explicitly designed to be robust. This raises a practical question: can a pretrained, non-robust model be adapted at test-time to improve adversarial robustness on a target distribution? To face this question, this work studies how adversarial training strategies behave when integrated into adaptation schemes for the unsupervised test-time setting, where only a small set of unlabeled target samples is available. It first analyzes how classical adversarial training formulations can be extended to this scenario, showing that straightforward distillation-based adaptations remain unstable and highly sensitive to hyperparameter tuning, particularly when the teacher itself is non-robust. To address these limitations, the work proposes a label-free framework that uses the predictions of a non-robust teacher model as a semantic anchor for both the clean and adversarial objectives during adaptation. We further provide theoretical insights showing that our formulation yields a more stable alternative to the self-consistency-based regularization commonly used in classical adversarial training. Experiments evaluate the proposed approach on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet under induced photometric transformations. The results support the theoretical insights by showing that the proposed approach achieves improved optimization stability, lower sensitivity to parameter choices, and a better robustness-accuracy trade-off than existing baselines in this post-deployment test-time setting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

32 of 44 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  8. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  10. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  11. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  12. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
20 more
  1. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  2. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  3. 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
  4. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
  5. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  6. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  7. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  8. 2022Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defensescited by 64
  9. 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
  10. 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
  11. 2023Decoupled Kullback-Leibler Divergence Losscited by 58
  12. 2021Reliable Adversarial Distillation with Unreliable Teacherscited by 56
  13. 2023Boosting Adversarial Transferability by Achieving Flat Local Maximacited by 48
  14. 2020A Simple Fine-tuning Is All You Need: Towards Robust Deep Learning Via Adversarial Fine-tuningcited by 30
  15. 2021Knowledge Distillation Methods for Efficient Unsupervised Adaptation Across Multiple Domainscited by 15
  16. 2023Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learningcited by 14
  17. 2024MedBN: Robust Test-Time Adaptation against Malicious Test Samplescited by 10
  18. 2022Generalizability of Adversarial Robustness Under Distribution Shiftscited by 6
  19. 2025Benchmarking the Spatial Robustness of DNNs via Natural and Adversarial Localized Corruptionscited by 3
  20. 2024Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Toward Understanding Adversarial Distillation: Why Robust Teachers Fail
  2. 2021Understanding Robustness in Teacher-Student Setting: A New Perspective
  3. 2024Distilling Adversarial Robustness Using Heterogeneous Teachers
  4. 2022Towards Alternative Techniques for Improving Adversarial Robustness: Analysis of Adversarial Training at a Spectrum of Perturbations
  5. 2025Improving Adversarial Robustness Through Adaptive Learning-Driven Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation
  6. 2026Learning Better Certified Models from Empirically-Robust Teachers
  7. 2021Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation: Robust Soft Labels Make Student Better
  8. 2022On the benefits of knowledge distillation for adversarial robustness