mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Bayesian Anomaly Mitigation: A Robust Loss that Doubles as an Unsupervised Contamination Classifier

arXiv 2606.16524 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.LG astro-ph.CO stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Engineered robust losses such as Huber, Student-t, and generalised cross-entropy make supervised models tolerant of contamination but cannot answer which observations are corrupted. We introduce Neural Bayesian Anomaly Mitigation (NBAM), a general-purpose drop-in loss derived from a Bayesian latent-switch mixture model: the marginal likelihood defines a robust supervised loss, and the associated posterior defines an unsupervised contamination classifier. Like Huber or Student-t, NBAM can replace the standard training loss in any supervised pipeline; unlike them, it additionally learns a structured contamination model and returns a calibrated per-sample contamination posterior. A learned input-dependent prior πφ(x) captures the spatial locality of contamination, so that samples near known corruptions are more likely to be flagged, while an Occam penalty emerges automatically and regularises against over-flagging. On CIFAR-10 with asymmetric label contamination, NBAM recovers the structure of the corruption process without supervision: the contamination posterior separates clean from corrupted samples, and the learned anomaly head identifies the direction of every label-flip pair. Alongside these capabilities, NBAM outperforms the four robust-loss baselines considered here at contamination rates 0.2-0.6.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 26 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  7. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  10. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
5 more
  1. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  2. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  3. 2025Radiometer Calibration using Machine Learningcited by 2
  4. 2023Towards the Identifiability in Noisy Label Learning: A Multinomial Mixture Modelling Approachcited by 1
  5. 2026Conditional Neural Bayes Ratio Estimation for Experimental Design Optimisationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.