mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Complexity Gains of Single-Task RL with a Curriculum

arXiv 2212.12809 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2022cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) problems can be challenging without well-shaped rewards. Prior work on provably efficient RL methods generally proposes to address this issue with dedicated exploration strategies. However, another way to tackle this challenge is to reformulate it as a multi-task RL problem, where the task space contains not only the challenging task of interest but also easier tasks that implicitly function as a curriculum. Such a reformulation opens up the possibility of running existing multi-task RL methods as a more efficient alternative to solving a single challenging task from scratch. In this work, we provide a theoretical framework that reformulates a single-task RL problem as a multi-task RL problem defined by a curriculum. Under mild regularity conditions on the curriculum, we show that sequentially solving each task in the multi-task RL problem is more computationally efficient than solving the original single-task problem, without any explicit exploration bonuses or other exploration strategies. We also show that our theoretical insights can be translated into an effective practical learning algorithm that can accelerate curriculum learning on simulated robotic tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 81 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2022.

Builds on

81 of 107 references.

References · 81

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  6. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  7. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  8. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  9. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  10. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  11. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  12. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
38 more
  1. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
  2. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  3. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  4. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
  5. 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 350
  6. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
  7. 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
  8. 2020Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 260
  9. 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 258
  10. 2017Automatic Goal Generation for Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 252
  11. 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 248
  12. 2021MT-Opt: Continuous Multi-Task Robotic Reinforcement Learning at Scalecited by 226
  13. 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 213
  14. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
  15. 2019Go-Explore: a New Approach for Hard-Exploration Problemscited by 207
  16. 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 200
  17. 2017Reverse Curriculum Generation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 185
  18. 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
  19. 2019Skew-Fit: State-Covering Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
  20. 2020Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 170
  21. 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
  22. 2022Evolving Curricula with Regret-Based Environment Designcited by 166
  23. 2015Incentivizing Exploration In Reinforcement Learning With Deep Predictive Modelscited by 154
  24. 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
  25. 2016EPOpt: Learning Robust Neural Network Policies Using Model Ensemblescited by 136
  26. 2021Discovering and Achieving Goals via World Modelscited by 131
  27. 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
  28. 2019Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policiescited by 117
  29. 2021Learning Language-Conditioned Robot Behavior from Offline Data and Crowd-Sourced Annotationcited by 117
  30. 2019Kinematic State Abstraction and Provably Efficient Rich-Observation Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  31. 2019Teacher algorithms for curriculum learning of Deep RL in continuously parameterized environmentscited by 113
  32. 2018Unsupervised Control Through Non-Parametric Discriminative Rewardscited by 102
  33. 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
  34. 2020Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  35. 2020C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive Classificationcited by 99
  36. 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 91
  37. 2020Automatic Curriculum Learning through Value Disagreementcited by 86
  38. 2020Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning with REINFORCEcited by 85

50 most cited of 81 All 81 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: