mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos Detection

arXiv 2602.01284 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2026cs.MM cs.CV cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As deepfake videos become increasingly difficult for people to recognise, understanding the strategies humans use is key to designing effective media literacy interventions. We conducted a study with 195 participants between the ages of 21 and 40, who judged real and deepfake videos, rated their confidence, and reported the cues they relied on across visual, audio, and knowledge strategies. Participants were more accurate with real videos than with deepfakes and showed lower expected calibration error for real content. Through association rule mining, we identified cue combinations that shaped performance. Visual appearance, vocal, and intuition often co-occurred for successful identifications, which highlights the importance of multimodal approaches in human detection. Our findings show which cues help or hinder detection and suggest directions for designing media literacy tools that guide effective cue use. Building on these insights can help people improve their identification skills and become more resilient to deceptive digital media.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 247
  4. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  5. 2024AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake Detectioncited by 59
  6. 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
  7. 2022Human Detection of Political Speech Deepfakes across Transcripts, Audio, and Videocited by 16
  8. 2022Testing Human Ability To Detect Deepfake Images of Human Facescited by 15
  9. 2022The Value of AI Guidance in Human Examination of Synthetically-Generated Facescited by 8
  10. 2022Diverse Misinformation: Impacts of Human Biases on Detection of Deepfakes on Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.