mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2211.13032 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from a single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decisions based on the average future returns is not suitable. For example, in a medical setting a patient may only have one opportunity to treat their illness. Making decisions using just the expected future returns -- known in reinforcement learning as the value -- cannot account for the potential range of adverse or positive outcomes a decision may have. Therefore, we should use the distribution over expected future returns differently to represent the critical information that the agent requires at decision time by taking both the future and accrued returns into consideration. In this paper, we propose two novel Monte Carlo tree search algorithms. Firstly, we present a Monte Carlo tree search algorithm that can compute policies for nonlinear utility functions (NLU-MCTS) by optimising the utility of the different possible returns attainable from individual policy executions, resulting in good policies for both risk-aware and multi-objective settings. Secondly, we propose a distributional Monte Carlo tree search algorithm (DMCTS) which extends NLU-MCTS. DMCTS computes an approximate posterior distribution over the utility of the returns, and utilises Thompson sampling during planning to compute policies in risk-aware and multi-objective settings. Both algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art in multi-objective reinforcement learning for the expected utility of the returns.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

21 of 89 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  2. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  3. 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
  4. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  5. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  6. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
  7. 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
  8. 2018Dynamic Weights in Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  9. 2021Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)cited by 55
  10. 2020A Distributional View on Multi-Objective Policy Optimizationcited by 51
  11. 2019Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Surveycited by 45
  12. 2021Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Dimensional Reward Functionscited by 21
9 more
  1. 2014Thompson sampling with the online bootstrapcited by 19
  2. 2017Monte-Carlo Tree Search by Best Arm Identificationcited by 13
  3. 2019Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  4. 2017Structured Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 11
  5. 2022Exploring the Pareto front of multi-objective COVID-19 mitigation policies using reinforcement learningcited by 9
  6. 2020Convex Hull Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 8
  7. 2021Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 6
  8. 2021Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 5
  9. 2022Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.