mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Models

arXiv 2207.00368 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many real-world problems contain multiple objectives and agents, where a trade-off exists between objectives. Key to solving such problems is to exploit sparse dependency structures that exist between agents. For example, in wind farm control a trade-off exists between maximising power and minimising stress on the systems components. Dependencies between turbines arise due to the wake effect. We model such sparse dependencies between agents as a multi-objective coordination graph (MO-CoG). In multi-objective reinforcement learning a utility function is typically used to model a users preferences over objectives, which may be unknown a priori. In such settings a set of optimal policies must be computed. Which policies are optimal depends on which optimality criterion applies. If the utility function of a user is derived from multiple executions of a policy, the scalarised expected returns (SER) must be optimised. If the utility of a user is derived from a single execution of a policy, the expected scalarised returns (ESR) criterion must be optimised. For example, wind farms are subjected to constraints and regulations that must be adhered to at all times, therefore the ESR criterion must be optimised. For MO-CoGs, the state-of-the-art algorithms can only compute a set of optimal policies for the SER criterion, leaving the ESR criterion understudied. To compute a set of optimal polices under the ESR criterion, also known as the ESR set, distributions over the returns must be maintained. Therefore, to compute a set of optimal policies under the ESR criterion for MO-CoGs, we present a novel distributional multi-objective variable elimination (DMOVE) algorithm. We evaluate DMOVE in realistic wind farm simulations. Given the returns in real-world wind farm settings are continuous, we utilise a model known as real-NVP to learn the continuous return distributions to calculate the ESR set.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.

Builds on

14 of 51 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  2. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  3. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  4. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  5. 2019Flow++: Improving Flow-Based Generative Models with Variational Dequantization and Architecture Designcited by 258
  6. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  7. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  8. 2021Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)cited by 55
  9. 2019Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Surveycited by 45
  10. 2013Incremental Pruning: A Simple, Fast, Exact Method for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processescited by 24
  11. 2022Exploring the Pareto front of multi-objective COVID-19 mitigation policies using reinforcement learningcited by 9
  12. 2021Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 6
2 more
  1. 2021Scalable Optimization for Wind Farm Control using Coordination Graphscited by 5
  2. 2021Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.