Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many real-world scenarios, the utility of a user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In this case, to apply multi-objective reinforcement learning, the expected utility of the returns must be optimised. Various scenarios exist where a user's preferences over objectives (also known as the utility function) are unknown or difficult to specify. In such scenarios, a set of optimal policies must be learned. However, settings where the expected utility must be maximised have been largely overlooked by the multi-objective reinforcement learning community and, as a consequence, a set of optimal solutions has yet to be defined. In this paper we address this challenge by proposing first-order stochastic dominance as a criterion to build solution sets to maximise expected utility. We also propose a new dominance criterion, known as expected scalarised returns (ESR) dominance, that extends first-order stochastic dominance to allow a set of optimal policies to be learned in practice. We then define a new solution concept called the ESR set, which is a set of policies that are ESR dominant. Finally, we define a new multi-objective distributional tabular reinforcement learning (MOT-DRL) algorithm to learn the ESR set in a multi-objective multi-armed bandit setting.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
10 of 49 references.
References · 10
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
- 2019Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Surveycited by 45
- 2019Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2020A utility-based analysis of equilibria in multi-objective normal form gamescited by 9
- 2021Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 5
- 2018Combinatorial Multi-Objective Multi-Armed Bandit Problemcited by 2
- 2021Exploring the Impact of Tunable Agents in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023What Lies beyond the Pareto Front? A Survey on Decision-Support Methods for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 5
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2022Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Modelscited by 3
- 2023Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 2
- 2025FairDICE: Fairness-Driven Offline Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2026AETDICE: Unified Framework and Offline Optimization for Nonlinear Multi-Objective RLcited by 0
- 2026AETDICE: Unified Framework and Offline Optimization for Nonlinear Multi-Objective RL30 Jun 2026
- 2025FairDICE: Fairness-Driven Offline Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning9 Jun 2025
- 2023What Lies beyond the Pareto Front? A Survey on Decision-Support Methods for Multi-Objective Optimization19 Nov 2023
- 2023Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Making9 May 2023
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning23 Nov 2022
- 2022Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Models1 Jul 2022