mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Making

arXiv 2106.01048 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many real-world scenarios, the utility of a user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In this case, to apply multi-objective reinforcement learning, the expected utility of the returns must be optimised. Various scenarios exist where a user's preferences over objectives (also known as the utility function) are unknown or difficult to specify. In such scenarios, a set of optimal policies must be learned. However, settings where the expected utility must be maximised have been largely overlooked by the multi-objective reinforcement learning community and, as a consequence, a set of optimal solutions has yet to be defined. In this paper we address this challenge by proposing first-order stochastic dominance as a criterion to build solution sets to maximise expected utility. We also propose a new dominance criterion, known as expected scalarised returns (ESR) dominance, that extends first-order stochastic dominance to allow a set of optimal policies to be learned in practice. We then define a new solution concept called the ESR set, which is a set of policies that are ESR dominant. Finally, we define a new multi-objective distributional tabular reinforcement learning (MOT-DRL) algorithm to learn the ESR set in a multi-objective multi-armed bandit setting.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

10 of 49 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  2. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  3. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  4. 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
  5. 2019Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Surveycited by 45
  6. 2019Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  7. 2020A utility-based analysis of equilibria in multi-objective normal form gamescited by 9
  8. 2021Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 5
  9. 2018Combinatorial Multi-Objective Multi-Armed Bandit Problemcited by 2
  10. 2021Exploring the Impact of Tunable Agents in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.