Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We describe a new approach for managing aleatoric uncertainty in the Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm. Instead of selecting actions according to a single statistic, we propose a distributional method based on the second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) relation. This compares the inherent dispersion of random returns induced by actions, producing a more comprehensive and robust evaluation of the environment's uncertainty. The necessary conditions for SSD require estimators to predict accurate second moments. To accommodate this, we map the distributional RL problem to a Wasserstein gradient flow, treating the distributional Bellman residual as a potential energy functional. We propose a particle-based algorithm for which we prove optimality and convergence. Our experiments characterize the algorithm performance and demonstrate how uncertainty and performance are better balanced using an textscssd policy than with other risk measures.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022Distributional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations for Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2021Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 6
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2024Utility-Based Reinforcement Learning: Unifying Single-objective and Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2021Bayesian Distributional Policy Gradientscited by 3
- 2022Learning with Stochastic Orderscited by 2
- 2023Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 2
- 2023Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Dual Expectile-Quantile Regressioncited by 1
- 2024Beyond Expectations: Learning with Stochastic Dominance Made Practicalcited by 1
- 2022When is Cognitive Radar Beneficial?cited by 0
- 2023Bag of Policies for Distributional Deep Explorationcited by 0
- 2024Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2024Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learning5 Aug 2024
- 2024Beyond Expectations: Learning with Stochastic Dominance Made Practical5 Feb 2024
- 2024Utility-Based Reinforcement Learning: Unifying Single-objective and Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning5 Feb 2024
- 2023Bag of Policies for Distributional Deep Exploration3 Aug 2023
- 2023Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Dual Expectile-Quantile Regression26 May 2023
- 2023Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Making9 May 2023
- 2022When is Cognitive Radar Beneficial?1 Dec 2022
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning23 Nov 2022
- 2022Learning with Stochastic Orders27 May 2022
- 2022Distributional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations for Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning24 May 2022
- 2021Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Making2 Jun 2021
- 2021Bayesian Distributional Policy Gradients20 Mar 2021