mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Implicit to Explicit Entropy Regularization: Benchmarking ViT Fine-tuning under Noisy Labels

arXiv 2410.04256 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic annotation of large-scale datasets can introduce noisy training data labels, which adversely affect the learning process of deep neural networks (DNNs). Consequently, Noisy Labels Learning (NLL) has become a critical research field for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), though it remains less explored for Vision Transformers (ViTs). In this study, we evaluate the vulnerability of ViT fine-tuning to noisy labels and compare its robustness with CNNs. We also investigate whether NLL methods developed for CNNs are equally effective for ViTs. Using linear probing and MLP-K fine-tuning, we benchmark two ViT backbones (ViT-B/16 and ViT-L/16) using three commonly used classification losses: Cross Entropy (CE), Focal Loss (FL), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), alongside six robust NLL methods: GCE, SCE, NLNL, APL, NCE+AGCE, and ANL-CE. The evaluation is conducted across six datasets including MNIST, CIFAR-10/100, WebVision, Clothing1M, and Food-101N. Furthermore, we explore whether implicit prediction entropy minimization contributes to ViT robustness against noisy labels, noting a general trend of prediction entropy reduction across most NLL methods. Building on this observation, we examine whether explicit entropy minimization could enhance ViT resilience to noisy labels. Our findings indicate that incorporating entropy regularization enhances the performance of established loss functions such as CE and FL, as well as the robustness of the six studied NLL methods across both ViT backbones.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2024.

Builds on

57 of 75 references.

References · 57

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  10. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  11. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  12. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
38 more
  1. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  2. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  3. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  6. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  7. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  9. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  11. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  12. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  13. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
  14. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  15. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  16. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
  17. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  18. 2021Parameter-efficient Multi-task Fine-tuning for Transformers via Shared Hypernetworkscited by 284
  19. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  20. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  21. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  22. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
  23. 2016CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 190
  24. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  25. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  26. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
  27. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  28. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  29. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
  30. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  31. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  32. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  33. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  34. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  35. 2022Three things everyone should know about Vision Transformerscited by 90
  36. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 88
  37. 2021An Image is Worth 16x16 Words, What is a Video Worth?cited by 87
  38. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.