InForecaster: Forecasting Influenza Hemagglutinin Mutations Through the Lens of Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The influenza virus hemagglutinin is an important part of the virus attachment to the host cells. The hemagglutinin proteins are one of the genetic regions of the virus with a high potential for mutations. Due to the importance of predicting mutations in producing effective and low-cost vaccines, solutions that attempt to approach this problem have recently gained a significant attention. A historical record of mutations have been used to train predictive models in such solutions. However, the imbalance between mutations and the preserved proteins is a big challenge for the development of such models that needs to be addressed. Here, we propose to tackle this challenge through anomaly detection (AD). AD is a well-established field in Machine Learning (ML) that tries to distinguish unseen anomalies from the normal patterns using only normal training samples. By considering mutations as the anomalous behavior, we could benefit existing rich solutions in this field that have emerged recently. Such methods also fit the problem setup of extreme imbalance between the number of unmutated vs. mutated training samples. Motivated by this formulation, our method tries to find a compact representation for unmutated samples while forcing anomalies to be separated from the normal ones. This helps the model to learn a shared unique representation between normal training samples as much as possible, which improves the discernibility and detectability of mutated samples from the unmutated ones at the test time. We conduct a large number of experiments on four publicly available datasets, consisting of 3 different hemagglutinin protein datasets, and one SARS-CoV-2 dataset, and show the effectiveness of our method through different standard criteria.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2022.
Builds on
20 of 68 references.
References · 20
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2018GANomaly: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Trainingcited by 409
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2015LSTM: A Search Space Odysseycited by 315
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
- 2017A Dual-Stage Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network for Time Series Predictioncited by 245
- 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 210
- 2018Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier for Novelty Detectioncited by 202
- 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
- 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
8 more
- 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
- 2020DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classificationcited by 121
- 2020Old is Gold: Redefining the Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier Training Paradigmcited by 115
- 2020From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarkscited by 90
- 2020Rethinking Assumptions in Deep Anomaly Detectioncited by 45
- 2020ARAE: Adversarially Robust Training of Autoencoders Improves Novelty Detectioncited by 27
- 2020Puzzle-AE: Novelty Detection in Images through Solving Puzzlescited by 23
- 2020Simple and Effective Prevention of Mode Collapse in Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.