Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanisms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the contraction properties of locally differentially private mechanisms. More specifically, we derive tight upper bounds on the divergence between PK and QK output distributions of an ε-LDP mechanism K in terms of a divergence between the corresponding input distributions P and Q, respectively. Our first main technical result presents a sharp upper bound on the chi2-divergence chi2(PK|QK) in terms of chi2(P|Q) and varepsilon. We also show that the same result holds for a large family of divergences, including KL-divergence and squared Hellinger distance. The second main technical result gives an upper bound on chi2(PK|QK) in terms of total variation distance mathsfTV(P, Q) and ε. We then utilize these bounds to establish locally private versions of the van Trees inequality, Le Cam's, Assouad's, and the mutual information methods, which are powerful tools for bounding minimax estimation risks. These results are shown to lead to better privacy analyses than the state-of-the-arts in several statistical problems such as entropy and discrete distribution estimation, non-parametric density estimation, and hypothesis testing.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.
Builds on
27 of 82 references.
References · 27
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 158
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
- 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
- 2020Differentially Private Assouad, Fano, and Le Camcited by 55
- 2015Communication Lower Bounds for Statistical Estimation Problems via a Distributed Data Processing Inequalitycited by 50
- 2022Optimal Algorithms for Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacycited by 36
- 2018Inference under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds from Chi-Square Contractioncited by 31
- 2017Optimal Schemes for Discrete Distribution Estimation under Locally Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2021Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local Randomizerscited by 27
15 more
- 2013Local Privacy, Data Processing Inequalities, and Statistical Minimax Ratescited by 26
- 2018Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communicationcited by 26
- 2018The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypothesescited by 26
- 2020Fisher information under local differential privacycited by 22
- 2020Unified lower bounds for interactive high-dimensional estimation under information constraintscited by 22
- 2021Optimal Compression of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 22
- 2021Local Differential Privacy Is Equivalent to Contraction of Eγ-Divergencecited by 17
- 2018Locally Private Mean Estimation: Z-test and Tight Confidence Intervalscited by 15
- 2019The Role of Interactivity in Local Differential Privacycited by 15
- 2019Local differential privacy: Elbow effect in optimal density estimation and adaptation over Besov ellipsoidscited by 13
- 2021Inference under Information Constraints III: Local Privacy Constraintscited by 13
- 2022Private Frequency Estimation via Projective Geometrycited by 9
- 2022The Role of Interactivity in Structured Estimationcited by 7
- 2018Linear Queries Estimation with Local Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2018INSPECTRE: Privately Estimating the Unseencited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraintscited by 10
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 7
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testingcited by 5
- 2023Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivitycited by 3
- 2024Locally Private Sampling with Public Datacited by 3
- 2025Locally Optimal Private Sampling: Beyond the Global Minimaxcited by 2
- 2025Query-Efficient Locally Private Hypothesis Selection via the Scheffe Graphcited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processingcited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processing11 Feb 2026
- 2025Locally Optimal Private Sampling: Beyond the Global Minimax10 Oct 2025
- 2025Query-Efficient Locally Private Hypothesis Selection via the Scheffe Graph19 Sep 2025
- 2024Locally Private Sampling with Public Data13 Nov 2024
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testing26 Jun 2024
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing26 Mar 2024
- 2023Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity9 Dec 2023
- 2023Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints9 Jan 2023