mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Private Frequency Estimation via Projective Geometry

arXiv 2203.00194 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2022cs.CR cs.DS cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we propose a new algorithm ProjectiveGeometryResponse (PGR) for locally differentially private (LDP) frequency estimation. For a universe size of k and with n users, our varepsilon-LDP algorithm has communication cost lceillog2krceil bits in the private coin setting and varepsilonlog2 e + O(1) in the public coin setting, and has computation cost O(n + kexp(varepsilon) log k) for the server to approximately reconstruct the frequency histogram, while achieving the state-of-the-art privacy-utility tradeoff. In many parameter settings used in practice this is a significant improvement over the O(n+k2) computation cost that is achieved by the recent PI-RAPPOR algorithm (Feldman and Talwar; 2021). Our empirical evaluation shows a speedup of over 50x over PI-RAPPOR while using approximately 75x less memory for practically relevant parameter settings. In addition, the running time of our algorithm is within an order of magnitude of HadamardResponse (Acharya, Sun, and Zhang; 2019) and RecursiveHadamardResponse (Chen, Kairouz, and Ozgur; 2020) which have significantly worse reconstruction error. The error of our algorithm essentially matches that of the communication- and time-inefficient but utility-optimal SubsetSelection (SS) algorithm (Ye and Barg; 2017). Our new algorithm is based on using Projective Planes over a finite field to define a small collection of sets that are close to being pairwise independent and a dynamic programming algorithm for approximate histogram reconstruction on the server side. We also give an extension of PGR, which we call HybridProjectiveGeometryResponse, that allows trading off computation time with utility smoothly.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2022.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  2. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
  3. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  4. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
  5. 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 73
  6. 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
  7. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 58
  8. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
  9. 2015Local, Private, Efficient Protocols for Succinct Histogramscited by 35
  10. 2017Optimal Schemes for Discrete Distribution Estimation under Locally Differential Privacycited by 28
  11. 2017Practical Locally Private Heavy Hitterscited by 28
  12. 2021Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local Randomizerscited by 27
4 more
  1. 2018Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communicationcited by 26
  2. 2021Optimal Compression of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 22
  3. 2017Heavy Hitters and the Structure of Local Privacycited by 20
  4. 2018Optimal locally private estimation under ℓp loss for 1≤ p≤ 2cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

9 papers.