mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communication

arXiv 1802.04705 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2018cs.LG cs.DS cs.ITcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of estimating k-ary distributions under varepsilon-local differential privacy. n samples are distributed across users who send privatized versions of their sample to a central server. All previously known sample optimal algorithms require linear (in k) communication from each user in the high privacy regime (varepsilon=O(1)), and run in time that grows as n· k, which can be prohibitive for large domain size k. We propose Hadamard Response (HR, a local privatization scheme that requires no shared randomness and is symmetric with respect to the users. Our scheme has order optimal sample complexity for all varepsilon, a communication of at most log k+2 bits per user, and nearly linear running time of tildeO(n + k). Our encoding and decoding are based on Hadamard matrices, and are simple to implement. The statistical performance relies on the coding theoretic aspects of Hadamard matrices, ie, the large Hamming distance between the rows. An efficient implementation of the algorithm using the Fast Walsh-Hadamard transform gives the computational gains. We compare our approach with Randomized Response (RR), RAPPOR, and subset-selection mechanisms (SS), both theoretically, and experimentally. For k=10000, our algorithm runs about 100x faster than SS, and RAPPOR.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 10; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

26 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local Randomizerscited by 27
  2. 2021Optimal Compression of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 22
  3. 2023Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimationcited by 22
  4. 2022Privacy-Aware Compression for Federated Data Analysiscited by 17
  5. 2022Discrete Distribution Estimation under User-level Local Differential Privacycited by 17
  6. 2021Privately Learning Mixtures of Axis-Aligned Gaussianscited by 13
  7. 2022XRand: Differentially Private Defense against Explanation-Guided Attackscited by 11
  8. 2022Private Frequency Estimation via Projective Geometrycited by 9
  9. 2023Federated Analytics: A surveycited by 9
  10. 2021Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and Streamingcited by 8
  11. 2022Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 8
  12. 2023Mean Estimation with User-level Privacy under Data Heterogeneitycited by 8
14 more
  1. 2022Degree-Preserving Randomized Response for Graph Neural Networks under Local Differential Privacycited by 7
  2. 2022The Role of Interactivity in Structured Estimationcited by 7
  3. 2022Robust Estimation of Discrete Distributions under Local Differential Privacycited by 5
  4. 2022Continual Mean Estimation Under User-Level Privacycited by 5
  5. 2022Algorithms for bounding contribution for histogram estimation under user-level privacycited by 4
  6. 2024Locally Private Sampling with Public Datacited by 3
  7. 2023Differentially Private Heavy Hitter Detection using Federated Analyticscited by 2
  8. 2026How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Lengthcited by 2
  9. 2023Private and Communication-Efficient Algorithms for Entropy Estimationcited by 1
  10. 2025Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet Expansioncited by 1
  11. 2025High-Probability Bounds For Heterogeneous Local Differential Privacycited by 1
  12. 2021Uniformity Testing in the Shuffle Model: Simpler, Better, Fastercited by 0
  13. 2025Near-optimal algorithms for private estimation and sequential testing of collision probabilitycited by 0
  14. 2026Robust Estimation of Sparse Numerical Vectors under Local Differential Privacycited by 0