Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When sensitive information is encoded in data, it is important to ensure the privacy of information when attempting to learn useful information from the data. There is a natural tradeoff whereby increasing privacy requirements may decrease the utility of a learning protocol. In the quantum setting of differential privacy, such tradeoffs between privacy and utility have so far remained largely unexplored. In this work, we study optimal privacy-utility tradeoffs for both generic and application-specific utility metrics when privacy is quantified by (varepsilon,δ)-quantum local differential privacy. In the generic setting, we focus on optimizing fidelity and trace distance between the original state and the privatized state. We show that the depolarizing mechanism achieves the optimal utility for given privacy requirements. We then study the specific application of learning the expectation of an observable with respect to an input state when only given access to privatized states. We derive a lower bound on the number of samples of privatized data required to achieve a fixed accuracy guarantee with high probability. To prove this result, we employ existing lower bounds on private quantum hypothesis testing, thus showcasing the first operational use of them. We also devise private mechanisms that achieve optimal sample complexity with respect to the privacy parameters and accuracy parameters, demonstrating that utility can be significantly improved for specific tasks in contrast to the generic setting. In addition, we show that the number of samples required to privately learn observable expectation values scales as Theta((varepsilon β)-2), where varepsilon ∈ (0,1) is the privacy parameter and β is the accuracy tolerance. We conclude by initiating the study of private classical shadows, which promise useful applications for private learning tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 46 references.
References · 28
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
- 2018Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 103
- 2020Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributionscited by 73
- 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 41
- 2022Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspectivecited by 32
- 2018The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypothesescited by 26
- 2017Differentially Private Testing of Identity and Closeness of Discrete Distributionscited by 25
- 2021Local Differential Privacy Is Equivalent to Contraction of Eγ-Divergencecited by 17
- 2019Privacy-Utility Trade-off of Linear Regression under Random Projections and Additive Noisecited by 13
16 more
- 2020Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 13
- 2020Classical Shadows With Noisecited by 13
- 2022Quantum Local Differential Privacy and Quantum Statistical Query Modelcited by 12
- 2018Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Distribution Estimationcited by 11
- 2023Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraintscited by 10
- 2023Quantum Pufferfish Privacy: A Flexible Privacy Framework for Quantum Systemscited by 9
- 2022Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 8
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 7
- 2023A unifying framework for differentially private quantum algorithmscited by 5
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testingcited by 5
- 2017Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs under Constrained Data Release Mechanismscited by 4
- 2025Quantum Information Ordering and Differential Privacycited by 3
- 2025Measured Hockey-Stick Divergence and its Applications to Quantum Pufferfish Privacycited by 2
- 2025Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discriminationcited by 1
- 2025Non-Linear Strong Data-Processing for Quantum Hockey-Stick Divergencescited by 1
- 2026When Does Quantum Differential Privacy Compose?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.