mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Locally Private Sampling with Public Data

arXiv 2411.08791 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Local differential privacy (LDP) is increasingly employed in privacy-preserving machine learning to protect user data before sharing it with an untrusted aggregator. Most LDP methods assume that users possess only a single data record, which is a significant limitation since users often gather extensive datasets (e.g., images, text, time-series data) and frequently have access to public datasets. To address this limitation, we propose a locally private sampling framework that leverages both the private and public datasets of each user. Specifically, we assume each user has two distributions: p and q that represent their private dataset and the public dataset, respectively. The objective is to design a mechanism that generates a private sample approximating p while simultaneously preserving q. We frame this objective as a minimax optimization problem using f-divergence as the utility measure. We fully characterize the minimax optimal mechanisms for general f-divergences provided that p and q are discrete distributions. Remarkably, we demonstrate that this optimal mechanism is universal across all f-divergences. Experiments validate the effectiveness of our minimax optimal sampler compared to the state-of-the-art locally private sampler.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2024.

Builds on

29 of 54 references.

References · 29

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
  3. 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
  4. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
  5. 2018Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 100
  6. 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learningcited by 86
  7. 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
  8. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
  9. 2019Limits of Private Learning with Access to Public Datacited by 39
  10. 2022Private Estimation with Public Datacited by 32
  11. 2017Optimal Schemes for Discrete Distribution Estimation under Locally Differential Privacycited by 29
  12. 2020Private Query Release Assisted by Public Datacited by 27
17 more
  1. 2021Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local Randomizerscited by 27
  2. 2018Hadamard Response: Estimating Distributions Privately, Efficiently, and with Little Communicationcited by 26
  3. 2020Fisher information under local differential privacycited by 22
  4. 2020Unified lower bounds for interactive high-dimensional estimation under information constraintscited by 22
  5. 2021Optimal Compression of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 22
  6. 2024Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Modelscited by 22
  7. 2023Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compressioncited by 14
  8. 2015The Bernstein Mechanism: Function Release under Differential Privacycited by 13
  9. 2024A Huber Loss Minimization Approach to Mean Estimation under User-level Differential Privacycited by 11
  10. 2022Private Frequency Estimation via Projective Geometrycited by 9
  11. 2023Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Datacited by 9
  12. 2022Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 8
  13. 2022Differentially Private Sampling from Distributionscited by 8
  14. 2023On Differentially Private Sampling from Gaussian and Product Distributionscited by 6
  15. 2024Rate Optimality and Phase Transition for User-Level Local Differential Privacycited by 6
  16. 2024Exactly Minimax-Optimal Locally Differentially Private Samplingcited by 5
  17. 2023Coupling public and private gradient provably helps optimizationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.