An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum hypothesis testing (QHT) has been traditionally studied from the information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of samples of an unknown state. In this paper, we study the sample complexity of QHT, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. By making use of the wealth of knowledge that already exists in the literature on QHT, we characterize the sample complexity of binary QHT in the symmetric and asymmetric settings, and we provide bounds on the sample complexity of multiple QHT. In more detail, we prove that the sample complexity of symmetric binary QHT depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the fidelity. As a counterpart of the quantum Stein's lemma, we also find that the sample complexity of asymmetric binary QHT depends logarithmically on the inverse type II error probability and inversely on the quantum relative entropy, provided that the type II error probability is sufficiently small. We then provide lower and upper bounds on the sample complexity of multiple QHT, with it remaining an intriguing open question to improve these bounds. The final part of our paper outlines and reviews how sample complexity of QHT is relevant to a broad swathe of research areas and can enhance understanding of many fundamental concepts, including quantum algorithms for simulation and search, quantum learning and classification, and foundations of quantum mechanics. As such, we view our paper as an invitation to researchers coming from different communities to study and contribute to the problem of sample complexity of QHT, and we outline a number of open directions for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 135 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2024.
Builds on
16 of 135 references.
References · 16
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
- 2019Private Hypothesis Selectioncited by 60
- 2015A Faster Cutting Plane Method and its Implications for Combinatorial and Convex Optimizationcited by 50
- 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 32
- 2022Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspectivecited by 32
- 2018Inference under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds from Chi-Square Contractioncited by 31
- 2018The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypothesescited by 26
- 2020Optimal Provable Robustness of Quantum Classification via Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 23
- 2019Inference under Information Constraints II: Communication Constraints and Shared Randomnesscited by 22
- 2022Communication-constrained hypothesis testing: Optimality, robustness, and reverse data processing inequalitiescited by 11
- 2015The Learnability of Unknown Quantum Measurementscited by 9
4 more
- 2023Quantum Pufferfish Privacy: A Flexible Privacy Framework for Quantum Systemscited by 9
- 2022Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 8
- 2024The Sample Complexity of Simple Binary Hypothesis Testingcited by 8
- 2020Quantum algorithm for Petz recovery channels and pretty good measurementscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 7
- 2025Quantum Doeblin Coefficients: Interpretations and Applicationscited by 2
- 2025Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discriminationcited by 1
- 2026Sample Complexity of Composite Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processingcited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Quantum Information Processing11 Feb 2026
- 2026Sample Complexity of Composite Quantum Hypothesis Testing13 Jan 2026
- 2025Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination17 Apr 2025
- 2025Quantum Doeblin Coefficients: Interpretations and Applications28 Mar 2025
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testing26 Jun 2024