On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization via Quantum Tunneling Walks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classical algorithms are often not effective for solving nonconvex optimization problems where local minima are separated by high barriers. In this paper, we explore possible quantum speedups for nonconvex optimization by leveraging the global effect of quantum tunneling. Specifically, we introduce a quantum algorithm termed the quantum tunneling walk (QTW) and apply it to nonconvex problems where local minima are approximately global minima. We show that QTW achieves quantum speedup over classical stochastic gradient descents (SGD) when the barriers between different local minima are high but thin and the minima are flat. Based on this observation, we construct a specific double-well landscape, where classical algorithms cannot efficiently hit one target well knowing the other well but QTW can when given proper initial states near the known well. Finally, we corroborate our findings with numerical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2022.
Builds on
39 of 79 references.
References · 39
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2018SPIDER: Near-Optimal Non-Convex Optimization via Stochastic Path Integrated Differential Estimatorcited by 283
- 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
- 2015A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insightscited by 203
- 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 124
- 2018An Alternative View: When Does SGD Escape Local Minima?cited by 115
- 2016A Variational Perspective on Accelerated Methods in Optimizationcited by 108
- 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 108
- 2021On the Validity of Modeling SGD with Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs)cited by 73
27 more
- 2019Optimization for deep learning: theory and algorithmscited by 70
- 2018Understanding the Acceleration Phenomenon via High-Resolution Differential Equationscited by 68
- 2018Sampling Can Be Faster Than Optimizationcited by 68
- 2019Explaining Landscape Connectivity of Low-cost Solutions for Multilayer Netscited by 63
- 2019On Connected Sublevel Sets in Deep Learningcited by 51
- 2019Sharp Analysis for Nonconvex SGD Escaping from Saddle Pointscited by 40
- 2021Oracle Complexity in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 38
- 2017Neon2: Finding Local Minima via First-Order Oraclescited by 36
- 2019Landscape Connectivity and Dropout Stability of SGD Solutions for Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 35
- 2020On Learning Rates and Schr"odinger Operatorscited by 33
- 2020From Symmetry to Geometry: Tractable Nonconvex Problemscited by 28
- 2017On the Optimization Landscape of Tensor Decompositionscited by 21
- 2018Convex optimization using quantum oraclescited by 19
- 2018Quantum algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimizationcited by 15
- 2018On the Local Minima of the Empirical Riskcited by 12
- 2021Negative curvature obstructs acceleration for strongly geodesically convex optimization, even with exact first-order oraclescited by 12
- 2016Simulated Quantum Annealing Can Be Exponentially Faster than Classical Simulated Annealingcited by 11
- 2021Escape saddle points by a simple gradient-descent based algorithmcited by 11
- 2020Quantum algorithms for escaping from saddle pointscited by 10
- 2019Every Local Minimum Value is the Global Minimum Value of Induced Model in Non-convex Machine Learningcited by 9
- 2017Efficiency of quantum versus classical annealing in non-convex learning problemscited by 8
- 2021Why Do Local Methods Solve Nonconvex Problems?cited by 8
- 2019Computational Separations between Sampling and Optimizationcited by 7
- 2019Analysis of the Optimization Landscapes for Overcomplete Representation Learningcited by 7
- 2016Quantum Speed-ups for Semidefinite Programmingcited by 6
- 2019Quantum algorithm for finding the negative curvature direction in non-convex optimizationcited by 1
- 2020How fast do quantum walks mix?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Quantum Langevin Dynamics for Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025FOCUS: First Order Concentrated Updating Schemecited by 7
- 2024Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Finite-Sum Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023A quantum-classical performance separation in nonconvex optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Quantum Non-Linear Bandit Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexitiescited by 2
- 2024Gradient Testing and Estimation by Comparisonscited by 0
- 2025Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descentcited by 0
- 2026Classical and Quantum Speedups for Non-Convex Optimization via Energy Conserving Descentcited by 0
- 2026Classical and Quantum Speedups for Non-Convex Optimization via Energy Conserving Descent14 Apr 2026
- 2025Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexities6 Jul 2025
- 2025Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent20 May 2025
- 2025Quantum Non-Linear Bandit Optimization4 Mar 2025
- 2025FOCUS: First Order Concentrated Updating Scheme21 Jan 2025
- 2024Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Finite-Sum Optimization5 Jun 2024
- 2024Gradient Testing and Estimation by Comparisons19 May 2024
- 2023Quantum Langevin Dynamics for Optimization27 Nov 2023
- 2023A quantum-classical performance separation in nonconvex optimization1 Nov 2023