mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Local Minima of the Empirical Risk

arXiv 1803.09357 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2018cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Population risk is always of primary interest in machine learning; however, learning algorithms only have access to the empirical risk. Even for applications with nonconvex nonsmooth losses (such as modern deep networks), the population risk is generally significantly more well-behaved from an optimization point of view than the empirical risk. In particular, sampling can create many spurious local minima. We consider a general framework which aims to optimize a smooth nonconvex function F (population risk) given only access to an approximation f (empirical risk) that is pointwise close to F (i.e., |F-f|∞ ≤ nu). Our objective is to find the ε-approximate local minima of the underlying function F while avoiding the shallow local minima---arising because of the tolerance nu---which exist only in f. We propose a simple algorithm based on stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on a smoothed version of f that is guaranteed to achieve our goal as long as nu ≤ O(ε1.5/d). We also provide an almost matching lower bound showing that our algorithm achieves optimal error tolerance nu among all algorithms making a polynomial number of queries of f. As a concrete example, we show that our results can be directly used to give sample complexities for learning a ReLU unit.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

12 papers.