Negative curvature obstructs acceleration for strongly geodesically convex optimization, even with exact first-order oracles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hamilton and Moitra (2021) showed that, in certain regimes, it is not possible to accelerate Riemannian gradient descent in the hyperbolic plane if we restrict ourselves to algorithms which make queries in a (large) bounded domain and which receive gradients and function values corrupted by a (small) amount of noise. We show that acceleration remains unachievable for any deterministic algorithm which receives exact gradient and function-value information (unbounded queries, no noise). Our results hold for the classes of strongly and nonstrongly geodesically convex functions, and for a large class of Hadamard manifolds including hyperbolic spaces and the symmetric space SL(n) / SO(n) of positive definite n × n matrices of determinant one. This cements a surprising gap between the complexity of convex optimization and geodesically convex optimization: for hyperbolic spaces, Riemannian gradient descent is optimal on the class of smooth and and strongly geodesically convex functions, in the regime where the condition number scales with the radius of the optimization domain. The key idea for proving the lower bound consists of perturbing the hard functions of Hamilton and Moitra (2021) with sums of bump functions chosen by a resisting oracle.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Infeasible Deterministic, Stochastic, and Variance-Reduction Algorithms for Optimization under Orthogonality Constraintscited by 18
- 2022Momentum Stiefel Optimizer, with Applications to Suitably-Orthogonal Attention, and Optimal Transportcited by 10
- 2022Sion's Minimax Theorem in Geodesic Metric Spaces and a Riemannian Extragradient Algorithmcited by 9
- 2022On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization via Quantum Tunneling Walkscited by 9
- 2023Minimizing Dynamic Regret on Geodesic Metric Spacescited by 6
- 2022Riemannian accelerated gradient methods via extrapolationcited by 5
- 2022Accelerated Riemannian Optimization: Handling Constraints with a Prox to Bound Geometric Penaltiescited by 4
- 2023Accelerated Methods for Riemannian Min-Max Optimization Ensuring Bounded Geometric Penaltiescited by 4
- 2023Riemannian Projection-free Online Learningcited by 4
- 2024Quantitative Convergences of Lie Group Momentum Optimizerscited by 1
- 2026Riemannian Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimation with Structure-Preserving Metrics for Geodesically Incomplete Manifoldscited by 0
- 2026Mirror Descent on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 0
- 2026Mirror Descent on Riemannian Manifolds18 Mar 2026
- 2026Riemannian Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimation with Structure-Preserving Metrics for Geodesically Incomplete Manifolds12 Jan 2026
- 2024Quantitative Convergences of Lie Group Momentum Optimizers30 May 2024
- 2023Riemannian Projection-free Online Learning30 May 2023
- 2023Accelerated Methods for Riemannian Min-Max Optimization Ensuring Bounded Geometric Penalties25 May 2023
- 2023Infeasible Deterministic, Stochastic, and Variance-Reduction Algorithms for Optimization under Orthogonality Constraints29 Mar 2023
- 2023Minimizing Dynamic Regret on Geodesic Metric Spaces17 Feb 2023
- 2022Accelerated Riemannian Optimization: Handling Constraints with a Prox to Bound Geometric Penalties26 Nov 2022
- 2022On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization via Quantum Tunneling Walks29 Sep 2022
- 2022Riemannian accelerated gradient methods via extrapolation13 Aug 2022
- 2022Momentum Stiefel Optimizer, with Applications to Suitably-Orthogonal Attention, and Optimal Transport27 May 2022
- 2022Sion's Minimax Theorem in Geodesic Metric Spaces and a Riemannian Extragradient Algorithm13 Feb 2022