Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bandits with knapsacks (BwK) constitute a fundamental model that combines aspects of stochastic integer programming with online learning. Classical algorithms for BwK with a time horizon T achieve a problem-independent regret bound of O(√T) and a problem-dependent bound of O(log T). In this paper, we initiate the study of the BwK model in the setting of quantum computing, where both reward and resource consumption can be accessed via quantum oracles. We establish both problem-independent and problem-dependent regret bounds for quantum BwK algorithms. For the problem-independent case, we demonstrate that a quantum approach can improve the classical regret bound by a factor of (1+√B/OPTLP), where B is budget constraint in BwK and OPTLP denotes the optimal value of a linear programming relaxation of the BwK problem. For the problem-dependent setting, we develop a quantum algorithm using an inexact quantum linear programming solver. This algorithm achieves a quadratic improvement in terms of the problem-dependent parameters, as well as a polynomial speedup of time complexity on problem's dimensions compared to classical counterparts. Compared to previous works on quantum algorithms for multi-armed bandits, our study is the first to consider bandit models with resource constraints and hence shed light on operations research.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.
Builds on
33 of 65 references.
References · 33
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
- 2018Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 100
- 2016Quantum Recommendation Systemscited by 69
- 2015A Faster Cutting Plane Method and its Implications for Combinatorial and Convex Optimizationcited by 50
- 2022A Survey on Quantum Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
- 2020Faster Dynamic Matrix Inverse for Faster LPscited by 44
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimizationcited by 42
- 2017Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better upper and lower boundscited by 27
- 2024More Asymmetry Yields Faster Matrix Multiplicationcited by 27
- 2020Quantum exploration algorithms for multi-armed banditscited by 22
21 more
- 2018Convex optimization using quantum oraclescited by 19
- 2022Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Stochastic Linear Bandits Enjoy Logarithmic Regretscited by 19
- 2021The Symmetry between Arms and Knapsacks: A Primal-Dual Approach for Bandits with Knapsackscited by 16
- 2021Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Multivariate Mean Estimationcited by 16
- 2018Quantum algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimizationcited by 15
- 2022Quantum policy gradient algorithmscited by 15
- 2015Efficient Inverse Maintenance and Faster Algorithms for Linear Programmingcited by 13
- 2017Improved Rectangular Matrix Multiplication using Powers of the Coppersmith-Winograd Tensorcited by 13
- 2023Quantum Bayesian Optimizationcited by 12
- 2022On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization via Quantum Tunneling Walkscited by 9
- 2023Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regretcited by 9
- 2023Quantum Speedups for Zero-Sum Games via Improved Dynamic Gibbs Samplingcited by 7
- 2023Quantum Hamiltonian Descentcited by 7
- 2023Quantum Langevin Dynamics for Optimizationcited by 7
- 2016Quantum Speed-ups for Semidefinite Programmingcited by 6
- 2021Quantum Interior Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimizationcited by 6
- 2022Mean estimation when you have the source code; or, quantum Monte Carlo methodscited by 6
- 2023Logarithmic-Regret Quantum Learning Algorithms for Zero-Sum Gamescited by 6
- 2022Quantum Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points of Nonconvex Functionscited by 4
- 2023A quantum central path algorithm for linear optimizationcited by 3
- 2025(Sub)Exponential Quantum Speedup for Optimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.