mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficiency of quantum versus classical annealing in non-convex learning problems

arXiv 1706.08470 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2017quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum annealers aim at solving non-convex optimization problems by exploiting cooperative tunneling effects to escape local minima. The underlying idea consists in designing a classical energy function whose ground states are the sought optimal solutions of the original optimization problem and add a controllable quantum transverse field to generate tunneling processes. A key challenge is to identify classes of non-convex optimization problems for which quantum annealing remains efficient while thermal annealing fails. We show that this happens for a wide class of problems which are central to machine learning. Their energy landscapes is dominated by local minima that cause exponential slow down of classical thermal annealers while simulated quantum annealing converges efficiently to rare dense regions of optimal solutions.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

8 papers.