mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning from Noisy Labels with Coarse-to-Fine Sample Credibility Modeling

arXiv 2208.10683 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training deep neural network (DNN) with noisy labels is practically challenging since inaccurate labels severely degrade the generalization ability of DNN. Previous efforts tend to handle part or full data in a unified denoising flow via identifying noisy data with a coarse small-loss criterion to mitigate the interference from noisy labels, ignoring the fact that the difficulties of noisy samples are different, thus a rigid and unified data selection pipeline cannot tackle this problem well. In this paper, we first propose a coarse-to-fine robust learning method called CREMA, to handle noisy data in a divide-and-conquer manner. In coarse-level, clean and noisy sets are firstly separated in terms of credibility in a statistical sense. Since it is practically impossible to categorize all noisy samples correctly, we further process them in a fine-grained manner via modeling the credibility of each sample. Specifically, for the clean set, we deliberately design a memory-based modulation scheme to dynamically adjust the contribution of each sample in terms of its historical credibility sequence during training, thus alleviating the effect from noisy samples incorrectly grouped into the clean set. Meanwhile, for samples categorized into the noisy set, a selective label update strategy is proposed to correct noisy labels while mitigating the problem of correction error. Extensive experiments are conducted on benchmarks of different modalities, including image classification (CIFAR, Clothing1M etc) and text recognition (IMDB), with either synthetic or natural semantic noises, demonstrating the superiority and generality of CREMA.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.

Builds on

39 of 59 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  8. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  9. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  11. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  12. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
27 more
  1. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  2. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  3. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  4. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  5. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  6. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  7. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  8. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  9. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  10. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  11. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  12. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  13. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  14. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  15. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  16. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  17. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  18. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  19. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  20. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  21. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  22. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  23. 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33
  24. 2020ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction for Training Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 33
  25. 2017Learning to Learn from Weak Supervision by Full Supervisioncited by 8
  26. 2018SOSELETO: A Unified Approach to Transfer Learning and Training with Noisy Labelscited by 5
  27. 2017Avoiding Your Teacher's Mistakes: Training Neural Networks with Controlled Weak Supervisioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.