Avoiding Your Teacher's Mistakes: Training Neural Networks with Controlled Weak Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training deep neural networks requires massive amounts of training data, but for many tasks only limited labeled data is available. This makes weak supervision attractive, using weak or noisy signals like the output of heuristic methods or user click-through data for training. In a semi-supervised setting, we can use a large set of data with weak labels to pretrain a neural network and then fine-tune the parameters with a small amount of data with true labels. This feels intuitively sub-optimal as these two independent stages leave the model unaware about the varying label quality. What if we could somehow inform the model about the label quality? In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised learning method where we train two neural networks in a multi-task fashion: a "target network" and a "confidence network". The target network is optimized to perform a given task and is trained using a large set of unlabeled data that are weakly annotated. We propose to weight the gradient updates to the target network using the scores provided by the second confidence network, which is trained on a small amount of supervised data. Thus we avoid that the weight updates computed from noisy labels harm the quality of the target network model. We evaluate our learning strategy on two different tasks: document ranking and sentiment classification. The results demonstrate that our approach not only enhances the performance compared to the baselines but also speeds up the learning process from weak labels.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4.
4 papers.
- 2022Learning from Noisy Labels with Coarse-to-Fine Sample Credibility Modelingcited by 2
- 2022XPASC: Measuring Generalization in Weak Supervision by Explainability and Associationcited by 1
- 2022Maximising the Utility of Validation Sets for Imbalanced Noisy-label Meta-learningcited by 1
- 2022Adaptive Graph-Based Feature Normalization for Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 0
- 2022Learning from Noisy Labels with Coarse-to-Fine Sample Credibility Modeling23 Aug 2022
- 2022Maximising the Utility of Validation Sets for Imbalanced Noisy-label Meta-learning17 Aug 2022
- 2022Adaptive Graph-Based Feature Normalization for Facial Expression Recognition22 Jul 2022
- 2022XPASC: Measuring Generalization in Weak Supervision by Explainability and Association3 Jun 2022