mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation

arXiv 2209.11679 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2022cs.IR cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Historical interactions are the default choice for recommender model training, which typically exhibit high sparsity, i.e., most user-item pairs are unobserved missing data. A standard choice is treating the missing data as negative training samples and estimating interaction likelihood between user-item pairs along with the observed interactions. In this way, some potential interactions are inevitably mislabeled during training, which will hurt the model fidelity, hindering the model to recall the mislabeled items, especially the long-tail ones. In this work, we investigate the mislabeling issue from a new perspective of aleatoric uncertainty, which describes the inherent randomness of missing data. The randomness pushes us to go beyond merely the interaction likelihood and embrace aleatoric uncertainty modeling. Towards this end, we propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework that consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. According to the theory of aleatoric uncertainty, we derive a new recommendation objective to learn the estimator. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty, which is demonstrated to improve the recommendation performance of less popular items without sacrificing the overall performance. We instantiate AUR on three representative recommender models: Matrix Factorization (MF), LightGCN, and VAE from mainstream model architectures. Extensive results on two real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of AUR w.r.t. better recommendation results, especially on long-tail items.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.

Builds on

28 of 67 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
  4. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  5. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
  6. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 278
  7. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  8. 2020Rectifying Pseudo Label Learning via Uncertainty Estimation for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 222
  9. 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
  10. 2018Billion-scale Commodity Embedding for E-commerce Recommendation in Alibabacited by 105
  11. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  12. 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 81
16 more
  1. 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
  2. 2015Modeling User Exposure in Recommendationcited by 69
  3. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  4. 2014PU Learning for Matrix Completioncited by 30
  5. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Learning Against Label Noise on Imbalanced Datasetscited by 28
  6. 2021Modeling Sequences as Distributions with Uncertainty for Sequential Recommendationcited by 22
  7. 2020M2GRL: A Multi-task Multi-view Graph Representation Learning Framework for Web-scale Recommender Systemscited by 21
  8. 2020Sampler Design for Implicit Feedback Data by Noisy-label Robust Learningcited by 18
  9. 2020Fast Adaptively Weighted Matrix Factorization for Recommendation with Implicit Feedbackcited by 17
  10. 2022UKD: Debiasing Conversion Rate Estimation via Uncertainty-regularized Knowledge Distillationcited by 14
  11. 2022Addressing Confounding Feature Issue for Causal Recommendationcited by 12
  12. 2020Convolutional Gaussian Embeddings for Personalized Recommendation with Uncertaintycited by 11
  13. 2021Be Causal: De-biasing Social Network Confounding in Recommendationcited by 9
  14. 2013Scalable Recommendation with Poisson Factorizationcited by 8
  15. 2017Deep density networks and uncertainty in recommender systemscited by 4
  16. 2021Multi-output Gaussian Processes for Uncertainty-aware Recommender Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.