Pretraining on Interactions for Learning Grounded Affordance Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lexical semantics and cognitive science point to affordances (i.e. the actions that objects support) as critical for understanding and representing nouns and verbs. However, study of these semantic features has not yet been integrated with the "foundation" models that currently dominate language representation research. We hypothesize that predictive modeling of object state over time will result in representations that encode object affordance information "for free". We train a neural network to predict objects' trajectories in a simulated interaction and show that our network's latent representations differentiate between both observed and unobserved affordances. We find that models trained using 3D simulations from our SPATIAL dataset outperform conventional 2D computer vision models trained on a similar task, and, on initial inspection, that differences between concepts correspond to expected features (e.g., roll entails rotation). Our results suggest a way in which modern deep learning approaches to grounded language learning can be integrated with traditional formal semantic notions of lexical representations.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2022.
Builds on
31 of 60 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2015Visual Semantic Role Labelingcited by 188
- 2019Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluationcited by 148
- 2017AffordanceNet: An End-to-End Deep Learning Approach for Object Affordance Detectioncited by 126
- 2018Flexible Neural Representation for Physics Predictioncited by 91
19 more
- 2020Learning Dexterous Grasping with Object-Centric Visual Affordancescited by 80
- 2020Learning Affordance Landscapes for Interaction Exploration in 3D Environmentscited by 65
- 2020Attention over learned object embeddings enables complex visual reasoningcited by 59
- 2015Learning Visual Predictive Models of Physics for Playing Billiardscited by 58
- 2021Embodied BERT: A Transformer Model for Embodied, Language-guided Visual Task Completioncited by 57
- 2018ShapeStacks: Learning Vision-Based Physical Intuition for Generalised Object Stackingcited by 55
- 2016SE3-Nets: Learning Rigid Body Motion using Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
- 2021PROST: Physical Reasoning of Objects through Space and Timecited by 48
- 2021PIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D Worldcited by 47
- 2020Learning Long-term Visual Dynamics with Region Proposal Interaction Networkscited by 44
- 2020Robot Object Retrieval with Contextual Natural Language Queriescited by 26
- 2021Does Vision-and-Language Pretraining Improve Lexical Grounding?cited by 25
- 2018Interpretable Intuitive Physics Modelcited by 19
- 2019Action2Vec: A Crossmodal Embedding Approach to Action Learningcited by 19
- 2017What can you do with a rock? Affordance extraction via word embeddingscited by 13
- 2020Predicting the Physical Dynamics of Unseen 3D Objectscited by 6
- 2016Generating Simulations of Motion Events from Verbal Descriptionscited by 3
- 2018Affordance Extraction and Inference based on Semantic Role Labelingcited by 3
- 2020A Visuospatial Dataset for Naturalistic Verb Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Are Large Language Models Temporally Grounded?cited by 25
- 2024OSCaR: Object State Captioning and State Change Representationcited by 16
- 2023Grounding and Distinguishing Conceptual Vocabulary Through Similarity Learning in Embodied Simulationscited by 6
- 2023Implicit Affordance Acquisition via Causal Action-Effect Modeling in the Video Domaincited by 1
- 2025Object Affordance Recognition and Grounding via Multi-scale Cross-modal Representation Learningcited by 1
- 2025Object Affordance Recognition and Grounding via Multi-scale Cross-modal Representation Learning2 Aug 2025
- 2024OSCaR: Object State Captioning and State Change Representation27 Feb 2024
- 2023Implicit Affordance Acquisition via Causal Action-Effect Modeling in the Video Domain18 Dec 2023
- 2023Are Large Language Models Temporally Grounded?14 Nov 2023
- 2023Grounding and Distinguishing Conceptual Vocabulary Through Similarity Learning in Embodied Simulations23 May 2023