mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Compressing Features for Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2206.13140 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised learning can be viewed as distilling relevant information from input data into feature representations. This process becomes difficult when supervision is noisy as the distilled information might not be relevant. In fact, recent research shows that networks can easily overfit all labels including those that are corrupted, and hence can hardly generalize to clean datasets. In this paper, we focus on the problem of learning with noisy labels and introduce compression inductive bias to network architectures to alleviate this over-fitting problem. More precisely, we revisit one classical regularization named Dropout and its variant Nested Dropout. Dropout can serve as a compression constraint for its feature dropping mechanism, while Nested Dropout further learns ordered feature representations w.r.t. feature importance. Moreover, the trained models with compression regularization are further combined with Co-teaching for performance boost. Theoretically, we conduct bias-variance decomposition of the objective function under compression regularization. We analyze it for both single model and Co-teaching. This decomposition provides three insights: (i) it shows that over-fitting is indeed an issue for learning with noisy labels; (ii) through an information bottleneck formulation, it explains why the proposed feature compression helps in combating label noise; (iii) it gives explanations on the performance boost brought by incorporating compression regularization into Co-teaching. Experiments show that our simple approach can have comparable or even better performance than the state-of-the-art methods on benchmarks with real-world label noise including Clothing1M and ANIMAL-10N. Our implementation is available at https://yingyichen-cyy.github.io/CompressFeatNoisyLabels/.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2022.

Builds on

44 of 70 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  8. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  9. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  10. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  11. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  12. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
32 more
  1. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  2. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  3. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  4. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  5. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  8. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  9. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  10. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  11. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  12. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  13. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  14. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  15. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  16. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  17. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  18. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  19. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  20. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  21. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
  22. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  23. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  24. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  25. 2014Learning Ordered Representations with Nested Dropoutcited by 84
  26. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  27. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  28. 2019Learning Sparse Networks Using Targeted Dropoutcited by 40
  29. 2021Boosting Co-teaching with Compression Regularization for Label Noisecited by 31
  30. 2018A Semi-Supervised Two-Stage Approach to Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 29
  31. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning with Noisy Labels: How to train your model when you cannot trust on the annotations?cited by 25
  32. 2020Unpacking Information Bottlenecks: Unifying Information-Theoretic Objectives in Deep Learningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.