Empirical Evaluation of Physical Adversarial Patch Attacks Against Overhead Object Detection Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial patches are images designed to fool otherwise well-performing neural network-based computer vision models. Although these attacks were initially conceived of and studied digitally, in that the raw pixel values of the image were perturbed, recent work has demonstrated that these attacks can successfully transfer to the physical world. This can be accomplished by printing out the patch and adding it into scenes of newly captured images or video footage. In this work we further test the efficacy of adversarial patch attacks in the physical world under more challenging conditions. We consider object detection models trained on overhead imagery acquired through aerial or satellite cameras, and we test physical adversarial patches inserted into scenes of a desert environment. Our main finding is that it is far more difficult to successfully implement the adversarial patch attacks under these conditions than in the previously considered conditions. This has important implications for AI safety as the real-world threat posed by adversarial examples may be overstated.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2022.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
References · 17
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
- 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
- 2018DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectorscited by 147
- 2018xView: Objects in Context in Overhead Imagerycited by 146
- 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
5 more
- 2016A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learningcited by 86
- 2018Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Researchcited by 57
- 2017NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
- 2019APRICOT: A Dataset of Physical Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectioncited by 31
- 2019Reduced Focal Loss: 1st Place Solution to xView object detection in Satellite Imagerycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Object Detectors in the Open Environment: Challenges, Solutions, and Outlookcited by 13
- 2024Environmental Matching Attack Against Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2024Breaking the Illusion: Real-world Challenges for Adversarial Patches in Object Detectioncited by 4
- 2026Printability-Constrained Adversarial Decals for Near-Nadir Aerial Perception: Measured Ink Gamuts, Nested Realism Constraints, and a Physical-World Boundcited by 0
- 2026Printability-Constrained Adversarial Decals for Near-Nadir Aerial Perception: Measured Ink Gamuts, Nested Realism Constraints, and a Physical-World Bound27 Sep 2026
- 2024Breaking the Illusion: Real-world Challenges for Adversarial Patches in Object Detection23 Oct 2024
- 2024Environmental Matching Attack Against Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Object Detection13 May 2024
- 2024Object Detectors in the Open Environment: Challenges, Solutions, and Outlook24 Mar 2024