mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threads

arXiv 2206.08406 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2022cs.SI cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tweets are the most concise form of communication in online social media, wherein a single tweet has the potential to make or break the discourse of the conversation. Online hate speech is more accessible than ever, and stifling its propagation is of utmost importance for social media companies and users for congenial communication. Most of the research barring a recent few has focused on classifying an individual tweet regardless of the tweet thread/context leading up to that point. One of the classical approaches to curb hate speech is to adopt a reactive strategy after the hate speech postage. The ex-post facto strategy results in neglecting subtle posts that do not show the potential to instigate hate speech on their own but may portend in the subsequent discussion ensuing in the post's replies. In this paper, we propose DRAGNET++, which aims to predict the intensity of hatred that a tweet can bring in through its reply chain in the future. It uses the semantic and propagating structure of the tweet threads to maximize the contextual information leading up to and the fall of hate intensity at each subsequent tweet. We explore three publicly available Twitter datasets -- Anti-Racism contains the reply tweets of a collection of social media discourse on racist remarks during US political and Covid-19 background; Anti-Social presents a dataset of 40 million tweets amidst the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-social behaviours; and Anti-Asian presents Twitter datasets collated based on anti-Asian behaviours during COVID-19 pandemic. All the curated datasets consist of structural graph information of the Tweet threads. We show that DRAGNET++ outperforms all the state-of-the-art baselines significantly. It beats the best baseline by an 11% margin on the Person correlation coefficient and a decrease of 25% on RMSE for the Anti-Racism dataset with a similar performance on the other two datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.

Builds on

36 of 81 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  6. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
  7. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  8. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
  9. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
  10. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 744
  11. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  12. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
24 more
  1. 2019Enhancing the Locality and Breaking the Memory Bottleneck of Transformer on Time Series Forecastingcited by 606
  2. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 386
  3. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  4. 2019Think Globally, Act Locally: A Deep Neural Network Approach to High-Dimensional Time Series Forecastingcited by 161
  5. 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 152
  6. 2017Conditional Time Series Forecasting with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 121
  7. 2016Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 99
  8. 2019A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Hate Speech Detection in Online Social Mediacited by 95
  9. 2019Diverse Trajectory Forecasting with Determinantal Point Processescited by 80
  10. 2017One-step and Two-step Classification for Abusive Language Detection on Twittercited by 46
  11. 2021Three Steps to Multimodal Trajectory Prediction: Modality Clustering, Classification and Synthesiscited by 46
  12. 2021Disentangling Hate in Online Memescited by 46
  13. 2020Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisiscited by 40
  14. 2018A Unified Deep Learning Architecture for Abuse Detectioncited by 37
  15. 2021DeepHate: Hate Speech Detection via Multi-Faceted Text Representationscited by 29
  16. 2019Popularity Prediction on Social Platforms with Coupled Graph Neural Networkscited by 26
  17. 2020Time Series Forecasting Using LSTM Networks: A Symbolic Approachcited by 25
  18. 2021AngryBERT: Joint Learning Target and Emotion for Hate Speech Detectioncited by 19
  19. 2018Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks for Space-Time Series Forecasting and Relations Discoverycited by 16
  20. 2019Probabilistic Forecasting of Sensory Data with Generative Adversarial Networks - ForGANcited by 16
  21. 2018Foundations of Sequence-to-Sequence Modeling for Time Seriescited by 15
  22. 2018Forecasting the presence and intensity of hostility on Instagram using linguistic and social featurescited by 11
  23. 2018Forecasting Transportation Network Speed Using Deep Capsule Networks with Nested LSTM Modelscited by 11
  24. 2020On Analyzing Antisocial Behaviors Amid COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

7 papers.