Forecasting the presence and intensity of hostility on Instagram using linguistic and social features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online antisocial behavior, such as cyberbullying, harassment, and trolling, is a widespread problem that threatens free discussion and has negative physical and mental health consequences for victims and communities. While prior work has proposed automated methods to identify hostile comments in online discussions, these methods work retrospectively on comments that have already been posted, making it difficult to intervene before an interaction escalates. In this paper we instead consider the problem of forecasting future hostilities in online discussions, which we decompose into two tasks: (1) given an initial sequence of non-hostile comments in a discussion, predict whether some future comment will contain hostility; and (2) given the first hostile comment in a discussion, predict whether this will lead to an escalation of hostility in subsequent comments. Thus, we aim to forecast both the presence and intensity of hostile comments based on linguistic and social features from earlier comments. To evaluate our approach, we introduce a corpus of over 30K annotated Instagram comments from over 1,100 posts. Our approach is able to predict the appearance of a hostile comment on an Instagram post ten or more hours in the future with an AUC of .82 (task 1), and can furthermore distinguish between high and low levels of future hostility with an AUC of .91 (task 2).
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online Conversationscited by 20
- 2022Proactive Moderation of Online Discussions: Existing Practices and the Potential for Algorithmic Supportcited by 15
- 2021Countering Online Hate Speech: An NLP Perspectivecited by 12
- 2024Outcome-Constrained Large Language Models for Countering Hate Speechcited by 12
- 2022Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online Discussionscited by 11
- 2023Hate Cannot Drive out Hate: Forecasting Conversation Incivility following Replies to Hate Speechcited by 10
- 2022Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threadscited by 7
- 2024How Did We Get Here? Summarizing Conversation Dynamicscited by 6
- 2021Predicting Different Types of Subtle Toxicity in Unhealthy Online Conversationscited by 5
- 2025Echoes of Discord: Forecasting Hater Reactions to Counterspeechcited by 5
- 2023Hashing it Out: Predicting Unhealthy Conversations on Twittercited by 0
- 2025Echoes of Discord: Forecasting Hater Reactions to Counterspeech27 Jan 2025
- 2024How Did We Get Here? Summarizing Conversation Dynamics29 Apr 2024
- 2024Outcome-Constrained Large Language Models for Countering Hate Speech25 Mar 2024
- 2023Hate Cannot Drive out Hate: Forecasting Conversation Incivility following Replies to Hate Speech8 Dec 2023
- 2023Hashing it Out: Predicting Unhealthy Conversations on Twitter17 Nov 2023
- 2022Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online Discussions2 Dec 2022
- 2022Proactive Moderation of Online Discussions: Existing Practices and the Potential for Algorithmic Support29 Nov 2022
- 2022Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threads16 Jun 2022
- 2021Countering Online Hate Speech: An NLP Perspective7 Sep 2021
- 2021Predicting Different Types of Subtle Toxicity in Unhealthy Online Conversations7 Jun 2021
- 2021Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online Conversations16 Feb 2021