mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Boundary State Generation for Testing and Improvement of Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv 2307.10590 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2023cs.SE cs.AI cs.ROcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and sensor technologies are enabling autonomous driving systems (ADSs) with an ever-increasing level of autonomy. However, assessing their dependability remains a critical concern. State-of-the-art ADS testing approaches modify the controllable attributes of a simulated driving environment until the ADS misbehaves. In such approaches, environment instances in which the ADS is successful are discarded, despite the possibility that they could contain hidden driving conditions in which the ADS may misbehave. In this paper, we present GENBO (GENerator of BOundary state pairs), a novel test generator for ADS testing. GENBO mutates the driving conditions of the ego vehicle (position, velocity and orientation), collected in a failure-free environment instance, and efficiently generates challenging driving conditions at the behavior boundary (i.e., where the model starts to misbehave) in the same environment instance. We use such boundary conditions to augment the initial training dataset and retrain the DNN model under test. Our evaluation results show that the retrained model has, on average, up to 3x higher success rate on a separate set of evaluation tracks with respect to the original DNN model.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.

Builds on

15 of 67 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  2. 2019Misbehaviour Prediction for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 55
  3. 2020Model-based Exploration of the Frontier of Behaviours for Deep Learning System Testingcited by 40
  4. 2021Mind the Gap! A Study on the Transferability of Virtual vs Physical-world Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 37
  5. 2022A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trendscited by 36
  6. 2021DeepHyperion: Exploring the Feature Space of Deep Learning-Based Systems through Illumination Searchcited by 29
  7. 2019Comparing Offline and Online Testing of Deep Neural Networks: An Autonomous Car Case Studycited by 27
  8. 2021Can Offline Testing of Deep Neural Networks Replace Their Online Testing?cited by 24
  9. 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 19
  10. 2021DeepGuard: A Framework for Safeguarding Autonomous Driving Systems from Inconsistent Behaviorcited by 17
  11. 2022Search-Based Testing of Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  12. 2023Testing of Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents with Surrogate Modelscited by 13
3 more
  1. 2020Digital Twins Are Not Monozygotic -- Cross-Replicating ADAS Testing in Two Industry-Grade Automotive Simulatorscited by 12
  2. 2023Two is Better Than One: Digital Siblings to Improve Autonomous Driving Testingcited by 9
  3. 2019Self-driving scale car trained by Deep reinforcement learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.