Boundary State Generation for Testing and Improvement of Autonomous Driving Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and sensor technologies are enabling autonomous driving systems (ADSs) with an ever-increasing level of autonomy. However, assessing their dependability remains a critical concern. State-of-the-art ADS testing approaches modify the controllable attributes of a simulated driving environment until the ADS misbehaves. In such approaches, environment instances in which the ADS is successful are discarded, despite the possibility that they could contain hidden driving conditions in which the ADS may misbehave. In this paper, we present GENBO (GENerator of BOundary state pairs), a novel test generator for ADS testing. GENBO mutates the driving conditions of the ego vehicle (position, velocity and orientation), collected in a failure-free environment instance, and efficiently generates challenging driving conditions at the behavior boundary (i.e., where the model starts to misbehave) in the same environment instance. We use such boundary conditions to augment the initial training dataset and retrain the DNN model under test. Our evaluation results show that the retrained model has, on average, up to 3x higher success rate on a separate set of evaluation tracks with respect to the original DNN model.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.
Builds on
15 of 67 references.
References · 15
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
- 2019Misbehaviour Prediction for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 55
- 2020Model-based Exploration of the Frontier of Behaviours for Deep Learning System Testingcited by 40
- 2021Mind the Gap! A Study on the Transferability of Virtual vs Physical-world Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 37
- 2022A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trendscited by 36
- 2021DeepHyperion: Exploring the Feature Space of Deep Learning-Based Systems through Illumination Searchcited by 29
- 2019Comparing Offline and Online Testing of Deep Neural Networks: An Autonomous Car Case Studycited by 27
- 2021Can Offline Testing of Deep Neural Networks Replace Their Online Testing?cited by 24
- 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 19
- 2021DeepGuard: A Framework for Safeguarding Autonomous Driving Systems from Inconsistent Behaviorcited by 17
- 2022Search-Based Testing of Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2023Testing of Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents with Surrogate Modelscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systemscited by 4
- 2024Exploring Critical Testing Scenarios for Decision-Making Policies: An LLM Approachcited by 2
- 2025AuthSim: Towards Authentic and Effective Safety-critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Testscited by 1
- 2025Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testingcited by 1
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026Evaluation as Evolution: Transforming Adversarial Diffusion into Closed-Loop Curricula for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 0
- 2026Evaluation as Evolution: Transforming Adversarial Diffusion into Closed-Loop Curricula for Autonomous Vehicles8 Apr 2026
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directions9 Dec 2025
- 2025Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testing11 Mar 2025
- 2025AuthSim: Towards Authentic and Effective Safety-critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Tests28 Feb 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systems21 Jan 2025
- 2024Exploring Critical Testing Scenarios for Decision-Making Policies: An LLM Approach9 Dec 2024