mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzing

arXiv 2407.04359 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024cs.AI cs.NE cs.SEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As autonomous driving systems (ADS) advance towards higher levels of autonomy, orchestrating their safety verification becomes increasingly intricate. This paper unveils ScenarioFuzz, a pioneering scenario-based fuzz testing methodology. Designed like a choreographer who understands the past performances, it uncovers vulnerabilities in ADS without the crutch of predefined scenarios. Leveraging map road networks, such as OPENDRIVE, we extract essential data to form a foundational scenario seed corpus. This corpus, enriched with pertinent information, provides the necessary boundaries for fuzz testing in the absence of starting scenarios. Our approach integrates specialized mutators and mutation techniques, combined with a graph neural network model, to predict and filter out high-risk scenario seeds, optimizing the fuzzing process using historical test data. Compared to other methods, our approach reduces the time cost by an average of 60.3%, while the number of error scenarios discovered per unit of time increases by 103%. Furthermore, we propose a self-supervised collision trajectory clustering method, which aids in identifying and summarizing 54 high-risk scenario categories prone to inducing ADS faults. Our experiments have successfully uncovered 58 bugs across six tested systems, emphasizing the critical safety concerns of ADS.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
  3. 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 119
  4. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 100
  5. 2022KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradientscited by 95
  6. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 89
  7. 2022SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 65
  8. 2017Ontology based Scene Creation for the Development of Automated Vehiclescited by 40
  9. 2022A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trendscited by 36
  10. 2021A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulationcited by 21
  11. 2021CausalAF: Causal Autoregressive Flow for Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generationcited by 20
  12. 2021Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 19
6 more
  1. 2022DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided Fuzzingcited by 19
  2. 2023BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 11
  3. 2022ANTI-CARLA: An Adversarial Testing Framework for Autonomous Vehicles in CARLAcited by 8
  4. 2021Intersection focused Situation Coverage-based Verification and Validation Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Implemented in CARLAcited by 4
  5. 2022Risk-Aware Scene Sampling for Dynamic Assurance of Autonomous Systemscited by 4
  6. 2022Critical concrete scenario generation using scenario-based falsificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.