mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ProActive: Self-Attentive Temporal Point Process Flows for Activity Sequences

arXiv 2206.05291 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Any human activity can be represented as a temporal sequence of actions performed to achieve a certain goal. Unlike machine-made time series, these action sequences are highly disparate as the time taken to finish a similar action might vary between different persons. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of these sequences is essential for many downstream tasks such as activity length prediction, goal prediction, etc. Existing neural approaches that model an activity sequence are either limited to visual data or are task specific, i.e., limited to next action or goal prediction. In this paper, we present ProActive, a neural marked temporal point process (MTPP) framework for modeling the continuous-time distribution of actions in an activity sequence while simultaneously addressing three high-impact problems -- next action prediction, sequence-goal prediction, and end-to-end sequence generation. Specifically, we utilize a self-attention module with temporal normalizing flows to model the influence and the inter-arrival times between actions in a sequence. Moreover, for time-sensitive prediction, we perform an early detection of sequence goal via a constrained margin-based optimization procedure. This in-turn allows ProActive to predict the sequence goal using a limited number of actions. Extensive experiments on sequences derived from three activity recognition datasets show the significant accuracy boost of ProActive over the state-of-the-art in terms of action and goal prediction, and the first-ever application of end-to-end action sequence generation.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2022.

Builds on

30 of 51 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  7. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,184
  8. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
  9. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
  10. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
  11. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
  12. 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 114
18 more
  1. 2018When will you do what? - Anticipating Temporal Occurrences of Activitiescited by 107
  2. 2015Every Moment Counts: Dense Detailed Labeling of Actions in Complex Videoscited by 93
  3. 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
  4. 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
  5. 2020Identifying Coordinated Accounts on Social Media through Hidden Influence and Group Behaviourscited by 47
  6. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
  7. 2019Rethinking the Discount Factor in Reinforcement Learning: A Decision Theoretic Approachcited by 32
  8. 2019A Variational Auto-Encoder Model for Stochastic Point Processescited by 30
  9. 2016Expecting to be HIP: Hawkes Intensity Processes for Social Media Popularitycited by 26
  10. 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
  11. 2017SenseGen: A Deep Learning Architecture for Synthetic Sensor Data Generationcited by 20
  12. 2021Long Horizon Forecasting With Temporal Point Processescited by 20
  13. 2022Learning Temporal Point Processes for Efficient Retrieval of Continuous Time Event Sequencescited by 14
  14. 2021Stimuli-Sensitive Hawkes Processes for Personalized Student Procrastination Modelingcited by 12
  15. 2021Region Invariant Normalizing Flows for Mobility Transfercited by 12
  16. 2022Doing More with Less: Overcoming Data Scarcity for POI Recommendation via Cross-Region Transfercited by 8
  17. 2019Point Process Flowscited by 6
  18. 2017Learning Person Trajectory Representations for Team Activity Analysiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

11 papers.