Tapestry of Time and Actions: Modeling Human Activity Sequences using Temporal Point Process Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human beings always engage in a vast range of activities and tasks that demonstrate their ability to adapt to different scenarios. Any human activity can be represented as a temporal sequence of actions performed to achieve a certain goal. Unlike the time series datasets extracted from electronics or machines, these action sequences are highly disparate in their nature -- the time to finish a sequence of actions can vary between different persons. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of these sequences is essential for many downstream tasks such as activity length prediction, goal prediction, next action recommendation, etc. Existing neural network-based approaches that learn a continuous-time activity sequence (or CTAS) are limited to the presence of only visual data or are designed specifically for a particular task, i.e., limited to next action or goal prediction. In this paper, we present ProActive, a neural marked temporal point process (MTPP) framework for modeling the continuous-time distribution of actions in an activity sequence while simultaneously addressing three high-impact problems -- next action prediction, sequence-goal prediction, and end-to-end sequence generation. Specifically, we utilize a self-attention module with temporal normalizing flows to model the influence and the inter-arrival times between actions in a sequence. In addition, we propose a novel addition over the ProActive model that can handle variations in the order of actions, i.e., different methods of achieving a given goal. We demonstrate that this variant can learn the order in which the person or actor prefers to do their actions. Extensive experiments on sequences derived from three activity recognition datasets show the significant accuracy boost of ProActive over the state-of-the-art in terms of action and goal prediction, and the first-ever application of end-to-end action sequence generation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2023.
Builds on
37 of 66 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,722
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
- 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,184
- 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
- 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 376
- 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
25 more
- 2020Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 226
- 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
- 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
- 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 114
- 2018When will you do what? - Anticipating Temporal Occurrences of Activitiescited by 107
- 2015Every Moment Counts: Dense Detailed Labeling of Actions in Complex Videoscited by 93
- 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
- 2021Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participantscited by 93
- 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
- 2020Identifying Coordinated Accounts on Social Media through Hidden Influence and Group Behaviourscited by 47
- 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
- 2019Imputing Missing Events in Continuous-Time Event Streamscited by 44
- 2019Rethinking the Discount Factor in Reinforcement Learning: A Decision Theoretic Approachcited by 32
- 2019A Variational Auto-Encoder Model for Stochastic Point Processescited by 30
- 2016Expecting to be HIP: Hawkes Intensity Processes for Social Media Popularitycited by 26
- 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
- 2017SenseGen: A Deep Learning Architecture for Synthetic Sensor Data Generationcited by 20
- 2021Long Horizon Forecasting With Temporal Point Processescited by 20
- 2022Learning Temporal Point Processes for Efficient Retrieval of Continuous Time Event Sequencescited by 14
- 2021Stimuli-Sensitive Hawkes Processes for Personalized Student Procrastination Modelingcited by 12
- 2021Region Invariant Normalizing Flows for Mobility Transfercited by 12
- 2022ProActive: Self-Attentive Temporal Point Process Flows for Activity Sequencescited by 11
- 2019Point Process Flowscited by 6
- 2017Learning Person Trajectory Representations for Team Activity Analysiscited by 5
- 2022Modeling Time-Series and Spatial Data for Recommendations and Other Applicationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.