mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Region Invariant Normalizing Flows for Mobility Transfer

arXiv 2109.05738 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2021cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There exists a high variability in mobility data volumes across different regions, which deteriorates the performance of spatial recommender systems that rely on region-specific data. In this paper, we propose a novel transfer learning framework called REFORMD, for continuous-time location prediction for regions with sparse checkin data. Specifically, we model user-specific checkin-sequences in a region using a marked temporal point process (MTPP) with normalizing flows to learn the inter-checkin time and geo-distributions. Later, we transfer the model parameters of spatial and temporal flows trained on a data-rich origin region for the next check-in and time prediction in a target region with scarce checkin data. We capture the evolving region-specific checkin dynamics for MTPP and spatial-temporal flows by maximizing the joint likelihood of next checkin with three channels (1) checkin-category prediction, (2) checkin-time prediction, and (3) travel distance prediction. Extensive experiments on different user mobility datasets across the U.S. and Japan show that our model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods for modeling continuous-time sequences. Moreover, we also show that REFORMD can be easily adapted for product recommendations i.e., sequences without any spatial component.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 41 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  6. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  7. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
  8. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
  9. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
  10. 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 114
  11. 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
  12. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
3 more
  1. 2017Fake News Mitigation via Point Process Based Interventioncited by 24
  2. 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
  3. 2015TribeFlow: Mining & Predicting User Trajectoriescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

12 papers.