A Study of Continual Learning Methods for Q-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present an empirical study on the use of continual learning (CL) methods in a reinforcement learning (RL) scenario, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been described before. CL is a very active recent research topic concerned with machine learning under non-stationary data distributions. Although this naturally applies to RL, the use of dedicated CL methods is still uncommon. This may be due to the fact that CL methods often assume a decomposition of CL problems into disjoint sub-tasks of stationary distribution, that the onset of these sub-tasks is known, and that sub-tasks are non-contradictory. In this study, we perform an empirical comparison of selected CL methods in a RL problem where a physically simulated robot must follow a racetrack by vision. In order to make CL methods applicable, we restrict the RL setting and introduce non-conflicting subtasks of known onset, which are however not disjoint and whose distribution, from the learner's point of view, is still non-stationary. Our results show that dedicated CL methods can significantly improve learning when compared to the baseline technique of "experience replay".
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2022.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
References · 30
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
18 more
- 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
- 2017PathNet: Evolution Channels Gradient Descent in Super Neural Networkscited by 364
- 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 360
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2021Continual World: A Robotic Benchmark For Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
- 2020A Theoretical Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting through the NTK Overlap Matrixcited by 103
- 2020Optimal Continual Learning has Perfect Memory and is NP-hardcited by 87
- 2018Task Agnostic Continual Learning Using Online Variational Bayescited by 61
- 2018Selfless Sequential Learningcited by 44
- 2021Same State, Different Task: Continual Reinforcement Learning without Interferencecited by 43
- 2021Understanding Continual Learning Settings with Data Distribution Drift Analysiscited by 38
- 2021CORA: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Metrics as a Platform for Continual Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 38
- 2019A comprehensive, application-oriented study of catastrophic forgetting in DNNscited by 35
- 2021An Investigation of Replay-based Approaches for Continual Learningcited by 26
- 2021Sequoia: A Software Framework to Unify Continual Learning Researchcited by 19
- 2021Catastrophic Interference in Reinforcement Learning: A Solution Based on Context Division and Knowledge Distillationcited by 15
- 2019Gradient-based training of Gaussian Mixture Models for High-Dimensional Streaming Datacited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
3 papers.