Asymptotic Instance-Optimal Algorithms for Interactive Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Past research on interactive decision making problems (bandits, reinforcement learning, etc.) mostly focuses on the minimax regret that measures the algorithm's performance on the hardest instance. However, an ideal algorithm should adapt to the complexity of a particular problem instance and incur smaller regrets on easy instances than worst-case instances. In this paper, we design the first asymptotic instance-optimal algorithm for general interactive decision making problems with finite number of decisions under mild conditions. On every instance f, our algorithm outperforms all consistent algorithms (those achieving non-trivial regrets on all instances), and has asymptotic regret C(f) ln n, where C(f) is an exact characterization of the complexity of f. The key step of the algorithm involves hypothesis testing with active data collection. It computes the most economical decisions with which the algorithm collects observations to test whether an estimated instance is indeed correct; thus, the complexity C(f) is the minimum cost to test the instance f against other instances. Our results, instantiated on concrete problems, recover the classical gap-dependent bounds for multi-armed bandits [Lai and Robbins, 1985] and prior works on linear bandits [Lattimore and Szepesvari, 2017], and improve upon the previous best instance-dependent upper bound [Xu et al., 2021] for reinforcement learning.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2022.
Builds on
27 of 50 references.
References · 27
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 218
- 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 201
- 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 197
- 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 195
- 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 105
- 2020Instance-Dependent Complexity of Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: A Disagreement-Based Perspectivecited by 78
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 60
15 more
- 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
- 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
- 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 49
- 2021Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Bounds for Tabular MDPs via Adaptive Multi-Step Bootstrapcited by 49
- 2019Adaptive Exploration in Linear Contextual Banditcited by 43
- 2018Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
- 2019Multi-Armed Bandits with Correlated Armscited by 34
- 2021Provable Model-based Nonlinear Bandit and Reinforcement Learning: Shelve Optimism, Embrace Virtual Curvaturecited by 32
- 2016Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identificationcited by 30
- 2017Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selectioncited by 28
- 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
- 2022Near Instance-Optimal PAC Reinforcement Learning for Deterministic MDPscited by 17
- 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
- 2020A Novel Confidence-Based Algorithm for Structured Banditscited by 7
- 2022On the complexity of All varepsilon-Best Arms Identificationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3.
7 papers.
- 2022The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 18
- 2023Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regretcited by 9
- 2023Variance-aware robust reinforcement learning with linear function approximation under heavy-tailed rewardscited by 8
- 2024Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2022On the Complexity of Representation Learning in Contextual Linear Banditscited by 2
- 2024Regret Minimization via Saddle Point Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment13 Jun 2024
- 2024Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement Learning11 Jun 2024
- 2024Regret Minimization via Saddle Point Optimization15 Mar 2024
- 2023Variance-aware robust reinforcement learning with linear function approximation under heavy-tailed rewards9 Mar 2023
- 2023Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret21 Feb 2023
- 2022On the Complexity of Representation Learning in Contextual Linear Bandits19 Dec 2022
- 2022The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learning9 Oct 2022