mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Complexity of Representation Learning in Contextual Linear Bandits

arXiv 2212.09429 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In contextual linear bandits, the reward function is assumed to be a linear combination of an unknown reward vector and a given embedding of context-arm pairs. In practice, the embedding is often learned at the same time as the reward vector, thus leading to an online representation learning problem. Existing approaches to representation learning in contextual bandits are either very generic (e.g., model-selection techniques or algorithms for learning with arbitrary function classes) or specialized to particular structures (e.g., nested features or representations with certain spectral properties). As a result, the understanding of the cost of representation learning in contextual linear bandit is still limited. In this paper, we take a systematic approach to the problem and provide a comprehensive study through an instance-dependent perspective. We show that representation learning is fundamentally more complex than linear bandits (i.e., learning with a given representation). In particular, learning with a given set of representations is never simpler than learning with the worst realizable representation in the set, while we show cases where it can be arbitrarily harder. We complement this result with an extensive discussion of how it relates to existing literature and we illustrate positive instances where representation learning is as complex as learning with a fixed representation and where sub-logarithmic regret is achievable.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 200
  2. 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 195
  3. 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 124
  4. 2020Bypassing the Monster: A Faster and Simpler Optimal Algorithm for Contextual Bandits under Realizabilitycited by 114
  5. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
  6. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  7. 2019Model selection for contextual banditscited by 60
  8. 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 48
  9. 2019Adaptive Exploration in Linear Contextual Banditcited by 43
  10. 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 40
  11. 2018Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  12. 2020Asymptotically Optimal Information-Directed Samplingcited by 33
11 more
  1. 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
  2. 2020Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 26
  3. 2020An Asymptotically Optimal Primal-Dual Incremental Algorithm for Contextual Linear Banditscited by 26
  4. 2020Regret Balancing for Bandit and RL Model Selectioncited by 20
  5. 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
  6. 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
  7. 2021Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identificationcited by 11
  8. 2020Crush Optimism with Pessimism: Structured Bandits Beyond Asymptotic Optimalitycited by 7
  9. 2022Asymptotic Instance-Optimal Algorithms for Interactive Decision Makingcited by 7
  10. 2021Feature and Parameter Selection in Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 5
  11. 2022Scalable Representation Learning in Linear Contextual Bandits with Constant Regret Guaranteescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.